ShareThis Page
Police warn of North Side impersonators |

Police warn of North Side impersonators

| Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:00 p.m

Pittsburgh police are warning residents about two men who were spotted impersonating police officers in the North Side and then robbed at least one motorist.

Just after midnight last night two people called police and said they were driving on Spring Hill Avenue at Itin Street in Spring Garden when a dark green Ford Taurus pulled behind them. The driver began flashing the Taurus’ headlights and drove beside the victim’s car, police said. The driver of the Taurus identified himself as a Pittsburgh police officer and told the victims to pull to the side of the road.

The Taurus pulled in front of the victim’s car and two white men got out and pointed semi-automatic handguns at the victims, who were told to get out of their car and put their hands on the hood. The suspects searched the victims, taking $40 from one and $200 from the other, police said. The suspects also removed the Ohio license plate from the victim’s vehicle.

Neither victim could give police license plate information on the Taurus, police said. They said the suspects showed them round badges in their wallets. The Taurus driver is described as being about 30 years old, 5 feet 10 inches tall and 180 pounds with long black hair. The second suspect is also described as being about 30 years old and bald. He was about 5 feet 8 inches tall and weighed about 170 pounds, police said.

Police spokeswoman Diane Richard said unmarked city police cars have flashing red and blue lights and all on-duty officers — plainclothes or uniform — will have a badge visible around their neck or belt. If you doubt an officer is legitimate, either drive to a well-lit, populated area or call 911 and ask for a marked patrol car to be sent to your location, Richard said.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.