Archive

ShareThis Page
Policemen’s treat | TribLIVE.com
News

Policemen’s treat

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:00 p.m

Recently, police officers have been in the news far too often in negative situations, which can cause younger children to be wary and afraid of them.

On Oct. 31 during trick-or-treating, Officer McAtee and Sgt. Swank of Greensburg police were patrolling in the Northmont neighborhood. These officers made their presence a positive interaction with the children and parents by waving and talking to the children as they made their way through the neighborhood.

When my child returned home, I asked, “How was trick-or-treating?” My child responded, “Great!” and was excited to tell about how the policeman stopped his car and told children to come on over and trick-or-treat. And before they walked away, he told them to be careful on their way home and make sure to check their treats with their parents.

In a child’s eyes, this gesture was something special. In a parent’s eyes, this gesture was greatly appreciated. This interaction was a positive influence on the children and showed them that police officers are there to protect and watch out for them. “Thank you” to these officers and their service.

Robin Savage

Greensburg

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.