ShareThis Page
58th House District: Walsh wins another term |

58th House District: Walsh wins another term

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 6, 2018 11:09 p.m
Justin Walsh, Republican

Republican incumbent state Rep. Justin Walsh will serve another two-year term as state representative after easily winning re-election Tuesday.

Walsh, 46, of Rostraver defeated Democratic West Newton Mayor Mary Popovich to secure his second full term in office. According to unofficial results, with all 66 precincts reporting, Walsh received 62 percent of the vote while Popovich received 38 percent. Results must still be certified by the county’s elections bureau.

Tuesday’s election was a repeat of the same race in 2016, when Walsh defeated Popovich to win the seat representing the 58th District, which includes Adamsburg, Arona, Jeannette, Madison, Mt. Pleasant, Monessen, North Belle Vernon, Rostraver, West Newton, Sutersville, Sewickley and parts of South Huntingdon, East Huntingdon and Hempfield.

“We continue on the path we’ve been on, growing the economy and moving Pennsylvania forward,” Walsh said.

Walsh, a lawyer, said he wants to focus his efforts in Harrisburg on attracting jobs to the region, fighting the opioid epidemic and improving school funding.

Popovich, 65, said during the campaign she would focus on the removal of blight from local communities and the opioid crisis.

Categories: Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.