Antiquated state election law blamed for low turnout |
Politics Election

Antiquated state election law blamed for low turnout

Fewer than one in five registered major party voters cast a ballot supporting a gubernatorial candidate on Tuesday, a figure some experts say Pennsylvania could improve if it overhauled the voter registration law.

Statewide turnout was just less than 17 percent for the primary, based on the number of registered Democratic and Republican voters who cast a ballot in the four-way Democratic gubernatorial race and uncontested GOP primary.

Barry Kauffman, director of the government watchdog Common Cause Pennsylvania, said midterm election turnout is usually lower than in presidential election years, but it’s higher than for municipal and judicial races in odd-numbered years. He advocates for numerous policies meant to modernize voter and election laws in Pennsylvania, including same-day voter registration and online-based voter registration.

“It saves money, it makes thing more accurate, it makes things more efficient and it makes things easier for voters,” he said.

Allegheny County’s turnout was 16.2 percent of 765,890 registered voters. Democrats voted at more than twice the rate as Republicans, at 19.8 percent compared with 8.3 percent. Westmoreland County also had 16.2 percent turnout ­— 20.7 percent among Democrats and 10.3 percent among Republicans in a pool of 211,688 registered voters.

Jonathan Brater, counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, said bills to make voter registration easier are a trend among state legislatures. About 25 percent of eligible voters nationwide are not registered.

“Registration is still the biggest barrier to voting,” he said. “The antiquated registration process we have is also a problem for the integrity of our elections.”

Same-day registration, which allows voters to sign up at a precinct on the day of the election, can increase turnout by as much as 7 percent, Brater said.

Pennsylvania’s Senate unanimously passed a bill last year that would establish an online application for voters to register or update their information. It has yet to be scheduled for a vote in the House State Government Committee.

A Senate fiscal analysis shows it would cost the Department of State up to $300,000 to implement the system. Despite potential start-up costs, Brater said digitizing processes can save money over time. In Maricopa County, Ariz., online voter registration decreased application processing costs from 83 cents to 3 cents per application, he said.

Brater said such measures usually receive bipartisan support.

“It’s not something that’s happening in red or blue states; it’s happening everywhere,” he said.

Melissa Daniels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8511 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.