ShareThis Page
CMU joins 16 universities to oppose ‘hardship’ of Trump’s travel ban |

CMU joins 16 universities to oppose ‘hardship’ of Trump’s travel ban

| Monday, February 13, 2017 2:24 p.m
Graduates stand as the national anthem is played during Carnegie Mellon University's commencement on Sunday, May 15, 2016, at Gesling Stadium in Oakland.

Carnegie Mellon and 16 other American research universities filed a legal brief Monday opposing President Donald Trump’s travel ban in a pending federal case in New York.

“Each university has a global mission, and each derives immeasurable benefit from the contributions of diverse students, faculty and scholars from around the world,” attorneys for the universities wrote in a filing known as an amicus, or friend of the court, brief.

“The executive order in this case threatens that ability, and creates significant hardship for (the universities’) valued international students, faculty and scholars,” according to the brief, which was filed in the U.S. Eastern District of New York.

The pending case there is related to Trump’s proposed ban on accepting immigrants from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

In the amicus brief, attorneys write that Carnegie Mellon has 26 students and seven faculty members and scholars from the seven countries.

Carnegie Mellon, which did not return a message, seeks to “focus on continued international engagement, and deeper and broader incorporation of the full CMU experience around the world,” the brief said.

To illustrate Carnegie Mellon’s commitment to that global mission and diversity, the brief said that CMU has campuses in Qatar and Rwanda and university president Subra Suresh is an immigrant who came to the United States “at age 21 with a partially filled suitcase, less than $100 in cash and a one-way airplane ticket purchased with a loan.”

Suresh, who is Indian, was on the faculty at Brown University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and served as director of the National Science Foundation before becoming Carnegie Mellon’s president.

The brief said 41 percent of Carnegie Mellon’s enrollment and 15 percent of its faculty are from foreign countries.

In addition to Carnegie Mellon, the universities who joined in the filing included all eight of the Ivy League’s members and the University of Chicago, Duke University, Emory University, Johns Hopkins University, MIT, Northwestern University, Stanford University and Vanderbilt University.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.