Dem Wolf eyes shale’s ‘golden egg’ to boost school funding |
Politics Election

Dem Wolf eyes shale’s ‘golden egg’ to boost school funding

Jasmine Goldband | Trib Total Media
Gubernatorial candidate Tom Wolf visits the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review on the North Side Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2014.

Tom Wolf, the Democrat who could become Pennsylvania’s next governor, wants to invest more in public education and transportation infrastructure.

But to see those plans through, his administration would require hundreds of millions of dollars from taxes on Marcellus shale and potentially from an increase in Pennsylvania personal income taxes.

Wolf, 65, a York County businessman and former state Department of Revenue secretary, told Tribune-Review reporters and editors on Tuesday that his legislative priorities are a severance tax on natural gas, a progressive approach to income taxes, connecting Pennsylvania regions through better infrastructure and expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to receive federal dollars.

“I don’t want to keep the seat warm; I actually want to get something done,” Wolf said. “I’m actually doing this because I want to fix things.”

A first-time candidate, Wolf spent millions of his money to win a primary race to challenge Gov. Tom Corbett, a first-term Republican who has been unable to shepherd some of his main agenda items through a Republican-controlled Legislature.

Wolf contrasted Corbett’s leadership with his experience running the Wolf Organization, a family-owned kitchen cabinet design and production firm. He was revenue secretary under Gov. Ed Rendell.

In politics, Wolf, by his own admission, is “new at this.”

He acknowledged gaps in his knowledge on specific issues and said he has no answers on proposals to expand online gaming, eliminate legislators’ per diems or the state’s pollution reduction plan under a directive from the Environmental Protection Agency.

On public-sector pensions — which Corbett calls a state budget crisis at $47 billion in unfunded liability — Wolf said the problem dates back about 14 years but won’t reach crisis stage unless lawmakers continue to “kick the can down the road.” He said he would work with the Legislature on ways to meet the state’s obligations.

Billy Pitman, Corbett’s campaign spokesman, said Wolf “denies” a pension crisis and his approach will take more money out of the pockets of families and business owners.

“Tom Wolf’s only answer seems to be, ‘Let’s raise taxes on whatever we can,’ ” Pitman said.

Wolf won the nomination in a 67-county sweep in the four-way May primary. He put $10 million of his money into the race and bought television advertisements early and often. He leads Corbett by 18.6 percentage points, according to the latest average of polls calculated by Real Clear Politics.

The most recent fundraising totals filed with the Department of State show Corbett had $4.8 million as of June 9. Wolf had $3.1 million. The next reports are due Sept. 23.

Should Wolf take the governor’s mansion, he likely faces the prospect of working with a Republican-controlled Legislature to achieve his progressive agenda. Wolf said he would lay out a vision and try to persuade enough legislators to support it.

“I’m not trying to move pieces around a sinking ship, I’m actually trying to make the ship sail better,” he said. “I have to convince people of that.”

Throughout the race, Wolf has said his priority is boosting school funding, the top-rated issue among voters.

Education, he said, is a “public, not a private, good.” He criticized the Corbett administration’s decision not to backfill an expiration of $1 billion in federal stimulus funds for education in the 2011 budget.

“I think part of the challenge of solving the education problem is making sure we’re adequately and fairly funding it,” Wolf said.

He proposes putting more state dollars toward public schools to decrease the property tax burden, using a 5 percent shale-gas tax revenue and an increase in personal income tax. His income tax plan would provide for an exemption up to a yet-to-be-determined dollar figure and apply a new flat rate for a progressive-taxation approach.

Shale gas, Wolf said, is the goose that “lays the golden egg” for the state. His proposed severance tax could yield hundreds of millions of dollars, based on market prices and how the tax is structured, Wolf said.

Industry warns against the proposal. North Fayette-based Marcellus Shale Coalition President Dave Spigelmyer said tax burdens could get in the way of businesses, jobs and economic gains generated by natural gas drilling.

“To be clear, new energy taxes will make Pennsylvania less competitive,” Spigelmyer said. “While shale development will remain here, the industry’s growth potential — and the broad-based associated benefits that could be fully realized — will be unnecessarily jeopardized.”

In that area, too, Wolf said he sees himself using negotiation to achieve his plans. Government, he said, can be an enabler to the industry.

“My message is, your industry could be a game-changer for Pennsylvania’s economy,” Wolf said. “Let’s see how we could make this work.”

Melissa Daniels is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8511 or [email protected]. Staff writer David Conti contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.