Democratic presidential candidate Sanders’ ad hits Wall Street links |
Politics Election

Democratic presidential candidate Sanders’ ad hits Wall Street links

The Associated Press
Sen. Bernie Sanders has repeatedly pledged not to run attack ads against primary opponent Hillary Clinton — a line her campaign says he’s crossed.

FAIRFIELD, Iowa — Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders launched a tough television ad critical of Goldman Sachs’ role in the financial meltdown and payment of speaking fees as he ramped up his criticism of Hillary Clinton’s ties to Wall Street, seeking an upset victory in Monday’s first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses.

The 30-second ad, circulated Thursday ahead of its scheduled Friday release, makes no mention of Clinton, who received more than $600,000 in speaking fees from the Wall Street firm. But it comes amid a push by Sanders to make policing the financial sector central to his presidential campaign.

“How does Wall Street get away from it? Millions in campaign contributions and speaking fees,” the ad says, describing Goldman Sachs’ recent $5 billion settlement from its role in the financial crisis. “Our economy works for Wall Street because it’s rigged by Wall Street, and that’s the problem.”

“As long as Washington is bought and paid for, we can’t build an economy that works for people,” the narrator says.

Sanders only appears at the end of the ad to approve the message. But he has driven a similar argument in recent weeks, seeking to capitalize on concerns by Democrats that Wall Street has become too influential in the nation’s economy and political system.

The so-called “democratic socialist” vows to break up the country’s biggest financial firms within a year if he’s elected president and limit banking fees placed on consumers. During the last presidential debate, Sanders pointed to Clinton’s Goldman Sachs speaking fees and took a swipe at Clinton during a Wednesday night event in Mason City, noting that Clinton was raising money at a Philadelphia investment firm while he was campaigning with Iowans.

Clinton argues that her financial regulation proposals would do more to crack down on industry abuses and rein in risky behavior within the shadow banking sector.

“We’ve got some work to do and I want to do it by getting the wealthy to pay their fair share for the benefits they have enjoyed by being Americans,” Clinton told several hundred voters gathered at a middle school in Newton, Iowa.

Responding to the ad, Clinton’s campaign said Sanders was shifting into attack mode and breaking his pledge not to run negative advertising.

“This last-minute sneak attack from the Sanders campaign is clearly meant to plaster the Iowa airwaves in the days before the caucus with negative ads slamming Hillary Clinton, without giving our campaign time to respond,” said Matt Paul, Clinton’s Iowa director. “It’s a cynical political ploy.”

The campaigns have had feisty exchanges as Iowa’s leadoff contest nears. A new Clinton ad says she would build upon President Obama’s health care law, “not start over,” and defend Planned Parenthood, “not attack it,” messages that reinforce charges she has made against Sanders.

In a statement, Sanders said the ad “completely distorts my record.”

Sanders is trying to upset Clinton in Iowa, where her advantage has narrowed in recent weeks, and then claim victory in New Hampshire, where polls show him with a steady lead in the Feb. 9 primary. Traveling by bus through Iowa, the senator predicted a win in Iowa if the turnout was large.

“If the turnout is not large, we’re going to be struggling,” he told staffers in Des Moines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.