Archive

Democratic state House incumbents in Allegheny cruise to victory | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Democratic state House incumbents in Allegheny cruise to victory

JesseWhite
Former State Rep. Jesse White, D-Cecil
ptrwhite050714
Tom Casciola, chairman of Cecil board of supervisor who is running for House District 46 seat held by Jesse White
ptrravenstahl042514
Tom Michalow, a high school teacher and former Avalon borough councilman, is running in the 20th House district.
ptrhouseraces052114
Pennsylvania state Rep. Adam Ravenstahl, D-Summer Hill, is running for re-election in the Democratic primary.

State Rep. Jesse White appears to have overcome what he called the “dark days” of his pseudonymous Internet escapades and was leading his Democratic challenger on Tuesday night.

White, 35, of Cecil won 56 percent of the vote with 63 percent of precincts reporting. Tom Casciola, 59, a homebuilder and chairman of Cecil’s board of supervisors, trailed with 44 percent.

“We stuck to a positive message. We stuck to the issues,” said White, who battled back from a 2013 scandal in which he used fake names while attacking critics — including constituents — on Internet message boards. “I think it shows voters are tired of a lot of the negativity, tired of the personal attacks.”

The four-term legislator will face Jason Ortitay, 30, of South Fayette, who was unopposed in the Republican primary.

White’s win capped a good night for Democratic state House incumbents in Allegheny County. Reps. Adam Ravenstahl, Ed Gainey, Dan Deasy and Tony DeLuca each led their challengers. Each entered Election Day with a county Democratic Committee endorsement.

Ravenstahl, 29, of Summer Hill appeared to hold off the progressive coalition backing his opponent, high school teacher and former Avalon councilman Tom Michalow, 43. Ravenstahl, who is seeking a third term, had 53 percent of the vote in the redrawn 20th District to Michalow’s 47 percent with 93 percent of precincts reporting.

Gainey, 44, of Lincoln-Lemington won 86 percent of the vote in a three-way race, beating Todd Elliott Koger, 52, of Wilkinsburg and William Anderson, 41, of Homewood. Koger won 6 percent to Anderson’s 8 percent with 96 percent of precincts reporting. No Republicans filed to challenge Gainey, who first won election in 2012 by ousting a 15-term incumbent, Joe Preston.

One of the longest-serving Western Pennsylvania Democrats, DeLuca all but locked up a 16th term in Harrisburg. DeLuca, 77, of Penn Hills led lawyer Kristopher Wiegand, 38, of Penn Hills 77 percent to 23 percent with 96 percent of precincts reporting. Barring a write-in challenge, DeLuca will be unopposed in November because no Republicans filed to run for the seat.

The election dealt yet another blow to A.J. Richardson’s quest for a political career. Richardson, 37, of Sheraden came in last in the 2013 mayor’s race after being arrested for DUI. This year, police arrested him and his wife for allegedly making phony 911 calls. Richardson trailed Deasy, 47, of Westwood by 84 percent to 15 percent with 96 percent of precincts reporting.

Republican firebrand Daryl Metcalfe, 51, a seven-term Cranberry Republican, had to fight against a write-in campaign by Gordon Marburger, 57, of Adams, who was kicked off the ballot for improperly filing paperwork with the state Ethics Commission. Metcalfe had 54 percent of the vote compared to 46 percent of ballots cast as write-ins — a 190-vote margin with 70 percent of precincts reporting.

The winner will face Democratic political newcomer Lisa Zucco, 44, of Cranberry in November. She ran unopposed.

Mike Wereschagin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.