Archive

ShareThis Page
Firing of Comey puts pressure on Trump, his team | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Firing of Comey puts pressure on Trump, his team

501585834
File - May 9: According to reports, US President Donald Trump has removed James Comey as FBI Director on May 9, 2017. NEW YORK, NY - DECEMBER 16: Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) Director James Comey answers questions at a press conference after speaking at the New York Police Department Shield Conference on December 16, 2015 in New York City. Comey spoke about terrorist threats facing the United States, the evolution of terrorism and how terrorists communicate over the internet, amongst other topics. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
AFPO93TQ
AFP/Getty Images
(FILES) This file photo taken on May 3, 2017 shows FBI Director James Comey as he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. US President Donald Trump on May 9, 2017 made the shock decision to fire his FBI director James Comey, the man who leads the agency charged with investigating his campaign's ties with Russia.'The president has accepted the recommendation of the Attorney General and the deputy Attorney General regarding the dismissal of the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,' White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters. / AFP PHOTO / JIM WATSONJIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
ComeyAbedin10567jpg2cb51
In this photo taken May 8, 2017, FBI Director James Comey speaks in Washington. A person familiar with the investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server says Huma Abedin did not forward 'hundreds and thousands' of emails to her husband's laptop, as FBI Director James Comey testified to Congress. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
AFPO93WX
AFP/Getty Images
(FILES) This file photo taken on March 20, 2017 shows FBI Director James Comey during the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on Russian actions during the 2016 election campaign on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. US President Donald Trump on May 9, 2017 made the shock decision to fire his FBI director James Comey, the man who leads the agency charged with investigating his campaign's ties with Russia.'The president has accepted the recommendation of the Attorney General and the deputy Attorney General regarding the dismissal of the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,' White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters. / AFP PHOTO / Nicholas KammNICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images
TrumpComey24665jpg735d7
FILE- In this May 3, 2017, file photo, FBI Director James Comey listens on Capitol Hill in Washington. President Donald Trump has fired Comey. In a statement on Tuesday, May 9, Trump says Comey’s firing “will mark a new beginning” for the FBI. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)

The firing of FBI Director James Comey brought to a stunning conclusion one of the most controversial chapters in the bureau’s modern history. Its timing raised fresh and potentially troublesome questions about the future of the investigation Comey was overseeing into possible links between associates of President Trump’s campaign and the Russian government.

There was a certain irony to the explanation offered for the dismissal – it focused on Comey’s handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. Many Democrats, including Clinton, believe that Comey’s reopening of the inquiry late in the campaign contributed to Trump’s victory last November. That’s one reason that, by the time of his dismissal, Comey had few public advocates and many detractors for his actions and his unwillingness to concede error.

That might explain why Trump’s order to fire him produced, initially at least, somewhat muted reactions among elected officials in both parties, or at least reactions that offered no clear defense of the FBI director.

But as the hours passed and the shock of the announcement rippled more widely, Democrats and some Republicans began to raise concerns about the timing and therefore the possible implications for a president whose administration has been clouded since its start by the Russia investigation, with any number of Democrats accusing Trump of an abuse of power.

Those concerns about what could happen to that probe were summed up most succinctly in a tweet by Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, who wrote: “Twilight zone. I was as disappointed and frustrated as anyone at how the email investigation was handled. But this terrifies me.”

The firing brought immediate comparisons to the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre under President Richard M. Nixon during the Watergate scandal. Those firings and resignations generated an immediate firestorm and a powerful backlash against the embattled president, one step along the way to eventual impeachment efforts and his resignation from office.

In that case, the attorney general refused to carry out Nixon’s orders to fire the Watergate special prosecutor. In this case, Trump said he was acting on the recommendation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and new Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

It was Rosenstein, a career prosecutor, who laid out the bill of particulars against Comey in a memorandum to Sessions. He was unsparing in his criticism of Comey’s handling of the Clinton email matter, noting, “My perspective on these issues is shared by former attorneys general and deputy attorneys general from different eras and both political parties.”

He said the FBI director had overstepped his authority and compounded the mistake by holding a press conference July 5, during which he announced that he would not seek prosecution but was sharply critical of Clinton. Rosenstein was equally critical of Comey’s decision to announce in a letter to Congress on Oct. 28 that he was reopening the investigation, a move Clinton’s advisers think was a contributing factor in her loss to Trump a few days later.

Rosenstein also said Comey was wrong to defend his actions, as recently as last week during testimony before a congressional committee. He ended by asserting, “The FBI is unlikely to regain public and congressional trust until it has a director who understands the gravity of the mistakes and pledges never to repeat them.”

Many Democrats would agree with the case Rosenstein presented to justify Comey’s firing, yet there were many questions about why now – and what finally triggered an action that is virtually without precedent. That a president whose campaign is under investigation would dismiss the official leading the investigation naturally evokes suspicions and concerns about the motives behind the action.

This, after all, is not the first Justice Department official removed by the president. Early in his term, Trump dismissed then-acting attorney general Sally Yates, who had declared that the Justice Department would not defend the president’s initial travel ban. Later, Preet Bharara, who was serving as the U.S. attorney for Manhattan, was fired after refusing a White House directive to resign.

The pattern and practice have fueled alarm among Democrats. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., a former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed as “a fig leaf” the explanation that Comey was fired for his handling of the Clinton investigation, arguing that it was instead a deliberate effort to impede a probe that could severely damage Trump’s administration. “This is nothing less than Nixonian,” he said in a statement.

The firing of Comey has left the administration once again in a quandary about how to proceed with respect to the investigation into the Trump campaign and the Russians. The administration long has resisted the probe, but in the wake of Tuesday’s stunning move, the president, the attorney general or the deputy attorney general will be called on to reassure the public that the investigation will continue just as aggressively.

Meanwhile, Trump will be under pressure to yield to calls for a special prosecutor to take over the case, a decision that might create greater confidence in the independence of the investigation but one that the president and his allies might see as a potentially more perilous course. It was notable that in his brief letter of dismissal to Comey, Trump went out of his way to declare that the FBI director had told him three times that he was not under investigation.

The president has tried to wish away the questions about possible collusion or cooperation between associates of his campaign and the Russians during last year’s election. He has been reluctant to accept, firmly, the conclusions of the intelligence community that the Russians interfered in the election with the purpose of hurting Clinton and therefore helping him. He has said there is no evidence of collusion.

Comey’s public statement earlier this spring that the bureau was looking into those allegations made it clear that, whatever the president said or tweeted, there was a serious investigation underway that was threatening to his administration. By dismissing Comey on Tuesday, the president has significantly raised the stakes — for the Justice Department, the FBI and ultimately his administration — to demonstrate that the investigation will continue to its rightful conclusion without interference.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.