Archive

ShareThis Page
Former Va. Sen. Webb launches presidential exploratory committee | TribLIVE.com
Politics/Election

Former Va. Sen. Webb launches presidential exploratory committee

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 20, 2014 8:24 a.m
Webb2016JPEG0a684
Former Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., says U.S. foreign policy has been “adrift” since the end of the Cold War.

Former U.S. Sen. Jim Webb, a Virginia Democrat, became the potential presidential contender on Wednesday by announcing he would form an exploratory committee.

Webb, 68, launched his campaign website on Twitter.

He did not say which party’s nomination he would seek. The committee allows Webb to raise money for a possible 2016 campaign.

In a 14-minute video on his website, Webb said he thinks most Americans are searching for leadership.

“In my view, the solutions are not simply political but those of leadership. I learned long ago, on the battlefields of Vietnam, that in a crisis, there is no substitute for clear-eyed leadership,” he said.

Webb, who served in the Marine Corps and was secretary of the Navy under President Ronald Reagan, has run for office only once, when he defeated Republican Sen. George Allen in 2006.

He decided not to seek re-election and served in the Senate until 2013.

Webb, who cast himself as an outsider, said in September that he was seriously considering a presidential run. Since then, he visited Iowa and New Hampshire, states that will hold the first caucus and first primary, respectively.

If Webb runs as a Democrat, he likely would face off with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Vice President Joe Biden and Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, all of whom have indicated probable runs for the party’s nomination.

Salena Zito is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at szito@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.