Gender equality elusive in Congress as fewer women run for office |
Politics Election

Gender equality elusive in Congress as fewer women run for office

Kathy Dahlkemper, a Democrat, was elected in 2008 to the U.S. House of Representatives.
Allyson Schwartz, a Democrat, was elected in 2004 to the U.S. House of Representatives.
Melissa Hart, a Republican, was elected in 2000 to the U.S. House of Representatives.
courtesy of Martin Luther King. Jr. Library
Veronica Grace Boland, a Democrat, was elected in 1942 to the 77th Congress.
Image courtesy of the Library of Congress
Vera Daerr Buchanan, a Democrat, was elected in 1951 and served in the 82nd through 84th sessions of Congress.
Image courtesy of Pocket Congressional Directory, 85th Congress
Kathryn Elizabeth Granahan, a Democrat, was elected in 1956 and served in the 84th through 87th sessions of Congress.
Image courtesy Congressional Pictorial Directory
Marjorie Margolies, a Democrat, was elected in 1992 and served in the 103rd Congress.

Women make up 51 percent of the nation’s population, but just 19 percent of its chief deliberative body.

Erie County Executive Kathy Dahlkemper, a former member of Congress, thinks the political system can do better.

“Anytime our elected leaders look more like the population, we’re better off,” said Dahlkemper, a Democrat who lost her 3rd District seat in 2010 to Republican Rep. Mike Kelly of Butler. “We just make our country better by having diversity that’s more representative.”

The 114th Congress includes a record 104 women, but none from Pennsylvania. The commonwealth is the most populous among 13 states without a woman in its delegation. Delaware, Mississippi and Vermont have not elected a woman to either chamber.

A body of social science shows that when women run for office, they win at the same rate as men, and they can raise campaign money just as well. But they don’t run for office at the same rates, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy, said Jennifer Lawless, political science professor at American University.

“Until we have more women in politics, it becomes very difficult to chip away at these perceptions that suggest women can’t get elected,” Lawless said.

A study she co-authored in March 2013 found that 20 percent of college-age men had thought “many times” about someday running for office, compared with 10 percent of college-aged women.

“Women and men who look equally qualified, and are on paper equally qualified, don’t self-assess the same way,” Lawless said. “Women are far more likely to doubt their qualifications.”

Women in politics around the world must deal with challenges with social perceptions — at least until they begin governing, said Sandra Pepera, director of the National Democratic Institute’s Gender, Women and Democracy Program.

“They’re more likely to be inclusive of other communities; they’re more likely to be focused on social issues,” Pepera said. “Women’s style, in general, is more collaborative and consensus-building.”

Dana Brown, executive director of the Pennsylvania Center for Women in Politics at Chatham University, said political parties can groom female candidates through programs such as the Anne B. Anstine Excellence in Public Service Series for Republican women in Pennsylvania.

“When we do have more women involved in elected office, we do see tangible benefits,” Brown said, citing government transparency and bipartisanship.

Yet the incumbency advantage is a tough barrier to break through for traditionally underrepresented groups, Lawless said. Women’s next real opportunity for significant gains is likely 2022, when census-based legislative redistricting could present more open seats, she said.

Dahlkemper, who was elected in 2008 in her first bid for public office, was shocked to learn she was just the seventh woman to represent Pennsylvania. She said increasing numbers of women running for president, Congress and governorships could inspire more bids.

“We don’t run as much for career,” she said. “Women tend to jump in when they’re really passionate about something.”

Montgomery County Democrat Allyson Schwartz was the only woman from Pennsylvania in the last Congress. She ran for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination instead of re-election but lost to Gov.-elect Tom Wolf.

Six female challengers who ran in Pennsylvania House races during the midterms lost. But nationally, the cycle produced some notable firsts.

Six Republican women are in the U.S. Senate, an all-time high, including Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia. Republican Sen. Joni Ernst became Iowa’s first woman in Congress and the Senate’s first female military veteran. Rep. Mia Love of Utah became the first black female Republican in Congress.

Democrats traditionally elect more women, experts say, and about a third of the members of the new House Democratic Caucus are women, with 65 women among 188 members.

“Change is slow, but change does happen,” said Brown of Chatham.

Former U.S. Rep. Melissa Hart, a Republican from Bradford Woods, served from 2001 through 2007 after 10 years in the state Senate. She took early advice from the late state Sen. Jeanette Reibman, a Democrat from eastern Pennsylvania.

“Your style will be a little different, your message will be a little different, and that will be extremely valuable,” Hart said. “That’s what I subscribed to when I served.”

Hart, an attorney in private practice, encourages women to get involved in politics, noting that the job can be enriching.

“It’s not as much of a sacrifice as they think, if they have the philosophy the United States government is something we’re all responsible for,” she said.

Melissa Daniels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.