Gov. Wolf rejects GOP’s new congressional district map |
Politics Election

Gov. Wolf rejects GOP’s new congressional district map

Wesley Venteicher
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf

Gov. Tom Wolf on Tuesday rejected a new congressional district map that state Republican leaders submitted to the State Supreme Court last week.

In a letter to State House Speaker Mike Turzai and Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, Wolf said the map favors Republicans. The court ordered lawmakers to craft the new map last month after ruling that the old map, drawn in 2011, violates the state constitution by unfairly favoring Republicans.

Turzai and Scarnati submitted the map Friday, the court’s deadline, after unsuccessfully appealing the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Wolf said the map fails to meet court requirements to create a map that is logical and compact and gives no partisan advantage.

The two Republicans said in a responding letter that the map does meet the court’s order.

“It is constitutional and meets the criteria set out by the court of compactness, contiguity and respecting political subdivisions,” Turzai and Scarnati said in the letter.

The Republicans called on Wolf to release his own map for the General Assembly to review, saying they would put it up for a vote.

The leaders added that they “do not concede” the court has the power to invalidate the map, saying it has been in place for three election cycles and passed the House with votes from Democrats.

If the two sides can’t agree on a map by Monday, the court will produce its own map, to be put in place before the May 15 primary elections.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.