Interest groups’ lobbying tally tops $500M in Pennsylvania |
Politics Election

Interest groups’ lobbying tally tops $500M in Pennsylvania

Andrew Russell
Lobbyists wait in the rotunda of the Capital Building.

HARRISBURG — Lobbyists wearing suits and gripping cellphones line the Capitol’s ornate rotunda balcony, crowd into committee meetings and orbit at the foot of the marble staircase between the House and Senate chambers.

The time of budget negotiations is peak season for the $500 million business of government influence.

In 2013, lobbyists spent $518 million on costs related to influencing Pennsylvania’s lawmakers. It’s the first time spending exceeded the half-billion-dollar mark, according to Department of State filings.

Spending was $450 million in 2007, the year rules began requiring lobbyists to disclose expenses, then dipped to $417 million in 2010.

Experts attribute the record high to rising costs across the board, improved reporting and the trickle-down effect that federal laws such as the Affordable Care Act have on state government.

To Dave Patti, a longtime lobbyist and executive director of the Pennsylvania Business Council, money is the means, but relationships are what count.

“There’s a lot that goes into this, a lot of rules of the game, before you get to the money,” he said. “Woody Allen said showing up is 90 percent of success, and that’s why all of us are up there today.”

Though lobbying sometimes carries a stigma of back-room deal-making, the First Amendment Center says lobbying is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment. Pennsylvania defines lobbying as “an effort to influence legislative action or administrative action.”

Reported expenditures cover salaries, travel expenses, public outreach and wining and dining of lawmakers. Lobbyists self-report quarterly, and they categorize expenses by topic. The lobbying categories with the five highest expenditures each year typically are health care, energy, education, Medicaid and Medicare, and taxation. Figures for each range from $14 million to $30 million.

Lobbies exist for more than 100 special interests, according to the self-reported classifications. Issues include banking, gambling, crime victim assistance, tobacco, firearms and the elderly.

Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer rights group, and an expert on governmental ethics, said statehouse lobbying spending is on the rise.

“We know money buys influence, and the industries are responding that way,” he said, pointing to health care lobbying as an example, in part because of Obamacare.

Spending on health care lobbying in Pennsylvania increased from $27.8 million in 2007 to $31 million in 2013.

Spending might increase when a state-specific issue becomes a hot topic. Last year, when the Legislature debated liquor store privatization, reported lobbying spending reached $5.2 million, up from between $2 million and $3 million in past years.

Totaling lobbyist spending among all states is difficult to calculate, Holman said, because disclosure laws vary. At the federal level, lobbying is a $3 billion-a-year business.

Lobbying expenditures reported in Pennsylvania don’t capture the full picture. State law exempts those whose lobbying expenses or earnings don’t exceed $2,500 in a quarter.

Nathan Benefield, vice president of policy analysis and a registered lobbyist with the free-market policy group Commonwealth Foundation, said some labor union officials are not registered lobbyists, even though they frequently contact state officials.

“How much they are spending on calls to action, unions getting their members to make calls — some of those costs seem not to be reflected in the reporting,” he said.

Wendell W. Young IV, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers 1776 union representing state liquor store employees, is not a registered lobbyist. He’s a fixture in the Capitol during liquor privatization debates.

He does not register because he said he falls under an exemption for those who are not paid for lobbying.

“My paycheck is for being the head of the union,” he said.

Young said union officials or corporate executives who choose to register can do so to obtain an access badge that permits them to bypass Capitol security, or because they might buy dinners or gifts they intend to report.

“As a labor union official, I report in excruciating detail to the federal government, as we are required to,” he said.

Patti, with the business council, said the notion of dinners at five-star restaurants and golf outings to buy votes is a Hollywood invention. In reality, networks of special interests, lawmakers, state agencies, media and academics get attention for an issue, he said.

Gabrielle Sedor became a registered lobbyist because 2006 lobbying disclosure laws appeared to apply to her role at Pennsylvania Advocacy and Resources for Autism and Intellectual Disabilities. She’s also president of the Pennsylvania Association for Government Relations.

Sedor said the increase in lobbying spending likely is because of rising costs overall. The figure includes raises in salaries and spikes in travel expenses such as gas prices.

The goals of lobbyists are to provide expertise and research about industry trends, she said — and to keep tabs on statehouse activity.

“To be a lobbyist and have a good relationship, you have to be honest and ethical and be a source of information, a reliable resource above anything else.”

Melissa Daniels is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at [email protected] or 412-380-8511.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.