ShareThis Page
McConnell’s Senate confirming few presidential nominees, analysis finds |

McConnell’s Senate confirming few presidential nominees, analysis finds

| Sunday, May 8, 2016 11:00 p.m

WASHINGTON — Since taking the reins of the Senate last year, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has striven to portray the upper house as “working again” under his Republican majority after years of partisan gridlock — passing major legislation on transportation, Medicare, drug abuse and more.

But by one measure highlighted by Democrats, the Senate has done remarkably little: An analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service found that, under McConnell, the current Senate has confirmed the fewest civilian presidential nominees of any Congress in the past 30 years.

Through April 30, 198 of President Obama’s nominees have won confirmation in the 114th Congress, excluding military appointments. Compare that to the 345 nominees confirmed up to that date in the final two years of President George W. Bush’s tenure or the 286 nominees confirmed in the comparable window under President Bill Clinton.

The analysis was commissioned by Senate Democratic leaders, who have bristled at McConnell’s attempts to portray the Senate as newly well-functioning. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., blamed repeated Republican filibusters for shutting down the Senate earlier in Obama’s term and says the only reason the Senate is working again is because Democrats are willing to work with the minority to pass bipartisan bills.

The report comes as Democrats are making a new push for the confirmation of Obama’s nominee to fill the Supreme Court vacancy caused by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February. Republicans have vowed to block Merrick Garland’s confirmation until the next president is elected, and Democrats are seizing on the ascension of Donald Trump to presumptive GOP presidential nominee to undermine that stance.

The current Senate’s record is particularly dim on judicial confirmations. Obama has seen 17 lifetime judges confirmed in the past 16 months, compared to 45 for Bush in the same timeframe, 40 for Clinton, and a whopping 82 for George H.W. Bush (including a Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas).

But Republicans have countered by pointing out that a similar number of Obama and Bush judicial nominees have been confirmed overall, thanks to a lame duck flurry of confirmations in late 2014, after Democrats lost the Senate.

Categories: Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.