ShareThis Page
N.Y. mayor to use some of fortune to back those who oppose police bills |

N.Y. mayor to use some of fortune to back those who oppose police bills

The Associated Press
| Monday, July 1, 2013 7:27 p.m
Getty Images
NEW YORK, NY - JUNE 30: New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg waves to revelers while marching in the New York Gay Pride Parade on June 30, 2013 in New York City. This year's parade was a particularly festive occasion, due to the recent Supreme Court Ruling that it was unconstitutional to ban gay marriage. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

NEW YORK — New York’s billionaire mayor said Monday he has the right to use some of his personal fortune to garner support from City Council members on police reform bills he plans to veto.

The two bills passed by the City Council last week establish an inspector general for the New York Police Department and make it easier for people who believe they have been racially profiled to sue the city. Bloomberg spent weeks first trying to prevent the passage of the bills and is now trying to veto the legislation.

But both bills passed with at least 34 votes, the minimum number needed to override a veto. On Monday, Bloomberg responded to a New York Post article reporting that he could use his wealth to influence City Council members up for re-election, saying he was willing to support candidates with whom he agrees, financially or otherwise.

The mayor noted that it was standard practice for outside groups to attempt to influence their representatives and said he would similarly push candidates to vote in his favor.

Bloomberg did not detail how he could do so, but he could potentially give to council candidates or make what are known as independent expenditures — such as ads advocating for or against them — on their behalf, subject to certain contribution limits and rules that would also apply to any other New Yorker.

Or he and his aides could also simply call and lobby City Council members to their cause.

“I’m going to encourage other people to vote for those things,” the mayor said at an unrelated news conference. “Some of these things are life and death issues, like these two horrendous bills in the City Council.”

The legislation grew out of increased scrutiny of the NYPD tactic known as stop and frisk, as well as a series of Associated Press stories that exposed extensive surveillance of Muslims.

Bloomberg says the techniques are necessary to make New York safe and along with Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly touts historic lows in murders and other violent crimes as a measure of how the tactics have worked.

Police have made about 5 million stops in the past decade, mostly of black and Hispanic men. Only about 10 percent are arrested.

Advocates of the measures denounced the mayor’s attempt to sway the bills’ passage. The group Communities United for Police Reform reiterated in a statement that the bills would protect New Yorkers’ civil rights and safety. Bloomberg is “now seeking to sow fear and spread around his billions of dollars to threaten council members and buy their votes,” said spokeswoman Joo-Hyun Kang.

Also Monday, Bill de Blasio, the New York City public advocate and a mayoral candidate, held a news conference in which he blasted the mayor on his policies and tactics.

“Mayor Bloomberg is wrong on the substance of the racial profiling bill. He’s wrong in his approach to stop and frisk,” he said. “But now what’s even worse is he’s going to use his wealth and his power to once again try and undermine the democratic process.”

Other mayoral candidates have also criticized Bloomberg’s response to the legislation.

Bloomberg has long channeled some of his fortune into political donations, and he stepped up his efforts last fall by forming a super PAC, Independence USA, to help candidates around the country who share his opinions — and oppose some who don’t — on such issues as gun control and same-sex marriage. It has spent about $12 million, Federal Election Commission records show.

He is not the first opponent of the legislation to pledge to influence the outcome. The Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, the city’s largest police union, last week promised to dedicate resources toward challenging candidates who supported the bills.

The mayor has 30 days from the bills’ passage to issue a veto, at which point the City Council would have another 30 days to override.

Categories: Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.