ShareThis Page
Peduto to start campaign for 2nd term as Pittsburgh mayor next year |
Politics Election

Peduto to start campaign for 2nd term as Pittsburgh mayor next year

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto plans to run for re-election in 2017.

The Point Breeze Democrat, 50, who is nearing the end of his second year in office, confirmed his re-election bid Friday.

Peduto, who took office after serving 12 years as a Pittsburgh councilman, said he will begin gearing up for the election at year’s end and start campaigning in 2016. He had $263,194 in available campaign funds, according to his most recent financial reports filed with the Allegheny County Elections Division.

He is so far the only Democrat to commit, said Nancy Mills, chairwoman of the Allegheny County Democratic Committee.

“I haven’t heard of anyone challenging him, but I’m sure somebody will,” she said. Allegheny County Republicans are also preparing for the race, said GOP committee Chairman Jim Roddey. Roddey said the committee is seeking candidates.

“We don’t have a candidate yet, but we’re looking for someone,” he said. “I’d like to have two to four so we have a choice.”

Pittsburgh voters will cast ballots for mayor in the primary on May 16, 2017, and general election on Nov. 7, according to the elections office.

Peduto was inaugurated as the city’s 60th mayor on Jan. 6, 2014, after a bizarre primary. Mayor Luke Ravenstahl pulled out of the race 11 days after announcing his re-election campaign.

Peduto won the general election in a landslide, collecting more than 84 percent of the vote.

Noting the city’s overwhelming Democratic voter registration edge, Roddey said it would be almost impossible for the GOP to defeat an incumbent Democrat for the mayor’s office. Pittsburgh hasn’t had a Republican mayor since the 1930s.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.