Pennsylvania’s property tax referendum has a long way to go if it passes |
Politics Election

Pennsylvania’s property tax referendum has a long way to go if it passes

Bob Bauder
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
The Pennsylvania State Capitol

Pennsylvania voters can decide through a ballot referendum next week if local governments and school districts should have the ability to exempt them from paying property taxes on their homes.

The question sounds like a no-brainer, but if it passes and state lawmakers go along with it, municipalities and school districts would have to make up the lost revenue through some other tax.

“It sounds good,” said Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald. “We’d all love to eliminate property taxes, but you can’t eliminate it unless you have a replacement.”

The referendum on the Nov. 7 election ballot asks voters:

“Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to permit the General Assembly to enact legislation authorizing local taxing authorities to exclude from taxation up to 100 percent of the assessed value of each homestead property within a local taxing jurisdiction, rather than limit the exclusion to one-half of the median assessed value of all homestead property, which is the existing law?”

What that means is state lawmakers would have the ability to create a law giving counties, municipalities and school districts authority to eliminate property taxes on a person’s home, according to state Rep. David Maloney, D-Berks, who sponsored legislation that led to the referendum.

It would not exempt commercial and industrial properties.

The state Homestead Exemption now allows taxing bodies to exempt up to 50 percent of the median value of all homes within their jurisdictions.

“What this amendment would do is take that language to 100 percent of assessed value (of a home),” Maloney said.

Maloney, who has supported property tax relief efforts since he was elected in 2010, called it the No. 1 issue for his district.

“It’s toxic,” he said. “I have senior citizens who will walk into my office and they’ll say, ‘I’ve come to the place where I cannot pay it. How can you help me?’”

Pennsylvanians have decried property taxes, particularly school taxes, for decades, according to state Sen. Wayne Fontana, D-Brookline.

“They already have the power to do 50 percent, and nobody does it,” he said. “The underlying effect of this referendum is it’s actually making us choose again between property tax, or wage tax, or sales tax, or some other tax.”

Paul Leger, Pittsburgh’s finance director, said the city couldn’t afford to increase the current exemption without another revenue source.

The city exempts the first $15,000 of a home’s assessed value; Allegheny County exempts $18,000; and the Pittsburgh Public School District exempts $29,447.

In 2018, 310,233 tax parcels in Allegheny County — up from 308,177 this year — will qualify for the exemption, resulting in $26.2 million in exempted payments, according to county spokeswoman Amie Downs.

“First of all, it has to pass the voters because it’s a constitutional change, then it has to pass the Legislature, then it has to pass all the individual municipalities that have to implement it,” Leger said. “It would be years before you really saw the result of it, and many municipalities probably wouldn’t do anything because you don’t have to.”

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.