ShareThis Page
Rendell endorses Fetterman for lieutenant governor |

Rendell endorses Fetterman for lieutenant governor

Wesley Venteicher
| Monday, December 4, 2017 12:30 p.m
Nate Smallwood | Trib Total Media
Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell

Former Gov. Ed Rendell has endorsed Braddock Mayor John Fetterman for lieutenant governor, Fetterman’s campaign announced Monday.

In a news release, Rendell praised Fetterman, 48, for his progressive Democratic views and for his experience working to revitalize the 2,100-person town he leads.

“In addition to his commitment to Western Pennsylvania, Fetterman has spent time in areas across the state, giving him important knowledge of the makeup of Pennsylvania and the kinds of support Pennsylvanians are looking for,” Rendell said in the release. “Now more than ever, we need someone who understands the entire state and not just certain corners of it, and Fetterman is that very person. Fetterman is an idealist and a realist, with a proven record of turning his visions into reality. This is what Pennsylvania needs, and this is why I am supporting him to be our Lieutenant Governor.”

Fetterman faces five other Democrats in the crowded primary for the traditionally low-profile office, including incumbent Mike Stack.

Also in the race are Army veteran and former congressional candidate Aryanna Berringer of Murrysville, Chester County Commissioner Kathi Cozzone, Montgomery County State Rep. Madeleine Dean and Lancaster County Commissioner Craig Lehman.

Nominees for governor and lieutenant governor appear together on general election ballots in Pennsylvania but run separately in primaries.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter .

Categories: Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.