ShareThis Page
Sen. Rand Paul invites top Russians to U.S. as they claim no election interference |

Sen. Rand Paul invites top Russians to U.S. as they claim no election interference

Sen. Rand Paul, center, and his communications director Sergio Gor, right, enter a hall during their meeting with Russian lawmakers in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Aug. 6, 2018. Paul said he invited Russian lawmakers to visit the United States to help foster inter-parliamentary contacts.
Sen. Rand Paul speaks during his meeting with Russian lawmakers in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Aug. 6, 2018. Paul said he invited Russian lawmakers to visit the United States to help foster inter-parliamentary contacts.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Rand Paul invited top Russian government officials to visit the United States later this year to continue a dialogue on important national security issues, he announced Monday.

The Kentucky Republican, who is leading a legislative delegation in the country this week, met with Konstantin Kosachev, the chairman of the Russian Federation Council Committee on Foreign Affairs. That committee is the Russian equivalent of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee that Paul sits on.

“Engagement is vital to our national security and peace around the world,” Paul said in a statement.

“Today, I met with Chairman Kosachev, and we agreed on the importance of continued dialogue. I invited the Russian Federation to send a delegation to the Capitol, and they have agreed to take this important next step,” Paul said.

At the conclusion of the hourlong meeting between Paul and Kosachev, Kosachev reiterated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s claim that his government did not interfere in the 2016 U.S. election.

There is unanimous agreement among U.S. intelligence agencies that the Russian government directed extensive influence operations to sow racial, political, and cultural division in the election.

Kosachev blamed the notion of Russia’s influence operations on American policymakers using it for political gain.

“The people who keep afloat this theory of conspiracy against the American democracy think that it is better for them to work in a unilateral key, using a monologue and unfounded accusations against Russia,” Kosachev said, according to Russia’s state-run RT news service.

“They use the anti-Russian campaign purely for internal American purposes, the interests of the same elections campaign they are charging us with meddling in,” Kosachev said.

Paul was one of the few American lawmakers to stick up for President Trump after he sided with Putin last month at a bilateral summit in Helsinki, Finland, where Putin said Russia did not interfere in the elections.

Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers back in Washington quickly pointed out in tweets and formal statements that Russia is not a friend of the U.S. and that the president should not accept Putin’s word as bond on matters of U.S. national security.

The House and Senate issued a flurry of bills and resolutions and to censure Russia and remind Putin that his aggressive foreign policy actions are intolerable to U.S. lawmakers.

The Senate unfurled a comprehensive sanctions package last week.

Paul, however, has stood by Trump, despite his remarks in Helsinki.

“We all do it,” he said in July about foreign election influence operations. “What we need to do is make sure our electoral process is protected.”

“They’re not going to admit it in the same way we’re not going to admit we were involved in the Ukrainian elections or the Russian elections,” Paul said.

Trump has invited Putin to the White House, a move largely panned by lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

Putin said he would be happy to meet Trump in Washington or Moscow, but the White House has since said the meeting will be postponed to 2019.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.