ShareThis Page
Toomey says repeal of Medicaid expansion must be negotiated |

Toomey says repeal of Medicaid expansion must be negotiated

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:18 a.m
Protesters demonstrate during a rally against U.S. Senator Pat Toomey in Philadelphia on March 1, 2017.

Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania said Monday that dealing with the Medicaid expansion in a repeal of former President Barack Obama’s health care law must be a “negotiated agreement.”

Toomey also said the sickest people, such as those with serious pre-existing conditions, should be covered through a high-risk pool that is subsidized by the government to make it affordable.

Toomey’s comments came during a stop at the studio of Philadelphia’s KYW-TV, where he answered several questions submitted online. The event came a few days after demonstrators were arrested at his Philadelphia office building during a “Tuesdays with Toomey” protest pressing for a meeting with him. Toomey met in Philadelphia on Monday with some members of the group.

Toomey is heavily critical of Obama’s health care law and says a transition to a new health insurance system could take a couple years.

Asked about what Republicans plan to do with the current law, he said coverage in the individual market must be stabilized, but he did not say what he supports on that front.

Toomey also said little about how to deal with the Medicaid expansion adopted by Pennsylvania and 30 other states – many with Republican governors – that has led to coverage of 11 million additional low-income people.

“A second thing we’ve got to figure out is how do we deal with the expansion of Medicaid that some states participated in and other states did not,” Toomey said. “We’ve got to resolve that, and that’s going to be, you know, a negotiated agreement.”

A House Republican plan envisions ending it, forcing states to absorb the extra cost or dump the coverage. He also did not say whether he supports a House GOP plan to curb spending on other Medicaid enrollees by providing states fixed annual amounts per beneficiary, although he has sponsored legislation to that effect in recent years.

He gave more detail about how to deal with the sickest people on Medicaid, including those with serious pre-existing conditions. He said Obama’s solution to that problem relied on heavily regulating the insurance sector, and had failed.

“I want to solve that problem a different way,” Toomey said. “The way I want to solve it is have people with expensive, chronic, complex health problems, put them in a pool where insurers then compete to cover them. We provide the subsidy that is needed because it’s otherwise unaffordable and leave the ordinary marketplace to serve the vast majority of people who are not in that category.”

Categories: Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.