Trump-backed South Carolina Gov. McMaster wins GOP runoff |
Politics Election

Trump-backed South Carolina Gov. McMaster wins GOP runoff

The Associated Press
Richard Shiro/AP
S.C. Gov. Henry McMaster (right) with President Donald Trump, speaks to the crowd at Airport High School in West Columbia, S.C. McMaster, one of Trump's earliest and most loyal supporters, won a key runoff Tuesday, as McMaster fended off a challenge from John Warren, a self-made millionaire, to secure the Republican gubernatorial nomination.

COLUMBIA, S.C. — One of President Donald Trump’s earliest and most loyal supporters won a key runoff Tuesday, as South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster fended off a challenge from a self-made millionaire to secure the Republican gubernatorial nomination.

“Be proud of South Carolina,” McMaster told a crowd of supporters gathered Tuesday night at his victory party. “There’s no other place like it.”

The vote tested the heft of Trump’s endorsement in South Carolina, where McMaster, 71, was elevated to the governorship he’d long sought early last year following the departure of Nikki Haley to serve as U.N. ambassador. As lieutenant governor, McMaster was the nation’s first statewide elected official to back Trump, ahead of South Carolina’s early presidential primary.

McMaster — a former state attorney general and U.S. attorney who was elected lieutenant governor in 2014 — has had the last year and a half to develop the mantle of an incumbent. He’s tallied up economic development announcements and championed issues aligned with the president’s priorities, such as clamping down on sanctuary cities and restricting funding for groups affiliated with abortions.

In November’s general election, he’ll seek a full term for the office that eluded him in 2010, when he lost a four-way primary to Haley in his first bid for governor.

Tuesday’s runoff threatened to embarrass the White House if the governor fell short to businessman and first-time candidate John Warren. Warren largely self-funded his effort and argued he was more similar to Trump than McMaster.

Two weeks ago, McMaster was the top individual vote-getter in the GOP gubernatorial primary but failed to get the majority needed to win it outright. Warren came in second and was quickly endorsed by the third- and fourth-place finishers.

At an election night party in Greenville, Warren, 39, told supporters that together they had started a new movement within South Carolina’s Republicans and that he hoped the momentum would continue despite the loss.

“Conservatives across this state have united, and they want to take their government back from the special interests, the political insiders,” Warren said. “And that message is worth repeating for years to come.”

Both Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have visited the state in recent days to campaign for McMaster. During a wide-ranging speech at a rally in West Columbia on Monday night, Trump implored Republicans to back McMaster. Trump pointed to his frequent nemesis, the news media, and warned that a loss for McMaster would be portrayed as a defeat for him.

“So please, get your asses out tomorrow and vote,” Trump said. He followed up the rally with a sunrise tweet telling voters McMaster “will never let you down” and tweeted a congratulatory message Tuesday night.

Trump has a mixed track record when going all-in for candidates. His preferred candidates have recently lost in Alabama and Pennsylvania.

On Tuesday night, McMaster said that he could continue the state’s upward momentum by parlaying his relationship with the Trump administration. One of his supporters said Tuesday that he felt the president’s backing of McMaster could give a needed boost to the campaign at a critical moment.

“He brought himself and Mike Pence here,” Tony Anderson Jr. of Conway said. “That just speaks volumes. Trump supports Henry because he knows Henry is a genuine guy.”

In November, McMaster faces Democratic state Rep. James Smith, who won his primary outright.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.