Archive

ShareThis Page
Trump finds Ford ‘credible,’ says he has ‘no message whatsoever’ for Senate | TribLIVE.com
Politics/Election

Trump finds Ford ‘credible,’ says he has ‘no message whatsoever’ for Senate

by THE WASHINGTON POST
| Friday, September 28, 2018 4:36 p.m.
284078AP18271668252022
President Trump pauses while speaking during a meeting with Chilean president Sebastian Pinera, in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Sept. 28, 2018, in Washington.

U.S. Senators should take the time they need to be “comfortable” with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump said Friday, adding that he found accuser Christine Blasey Ford “credible.”

Trump said he will defer to Senate Republicans to decide how to respond to what he called the “delay” in a final vote on Kavanaugh on the Senate floor, but he reiterated his support for his nominee.

The president spoke in the Oval Office shortly after Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., said he will condition a final “yes” vote on a new FBI investigation into sexual assault and misconduct claims against Kavanaugh. Flake said that investigation should last no more than a week.

“I’m going to let the Senate handle that,” Trump said when asked about the development. “They’ll make their decisions.”

Meeting with visiting Chilean President Sebastián Piñera, Trump was calm and measured despite the unexpected detour on the path to Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which the White House had hoped to conclude before the start of the next Supreme Court term on Monday.

“I have no message” to senators about the potential delay, Trump said in response to reporters’ questions. “They have to do what they think is right. There is no message whatsoever. They have to do what they think is right. They have to be comfortable with themselves, and I’m sure that’s what they want.”

Trump said he was “not even a little bit” considering a replacement for Kavanaugh.

But he said that Ford, who testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday that Kavanaugh had pinned her to a bed and attempted to rape her when she was 15, was “very compelling.”

“Certainly she was a very credible witness. She was very good in many respects,” Trump said. “And I think that, I don’t know if this is going to continue onward, or if we’re going to get a vote.” Trump added that he was still catching up to developments.

He also praised Kavanaugh’s testimony Thursday as “really something that I hadn’t seen before. Incredible. It was an incredible moment in the history of our country.”

“I think it will work out very well for the country. I just want it to work out well for the country,” Trump said. “If that happens, I’m happy.”

Trump praised committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who had presided, tight-lipped, as Flake told senators he would vote to advance Kavanaugh to the floor but wanted the further inquiry before he could vote to confirm him.

“I’m going to rely on all the people, including Senator Grassley, who is doing a very good job,” Trump said.

“That is going to be a decision they are going to make, and I suspect they’ll be making some decision soon whether to take a vote or do whatever else they want to do. I will be totally reliant on what Senator Grassley and the group decides to do.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.