Archive

ShareThis Page
Trump urges Pa. Republicans to fight new congressional districts | TribLIVE.com
Politics/Election

Trump urges Pa. Republicans to fight new congressional districts

ptrCongDistNew022018
State of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania congressional map imposed by the state Supreme Court on Feb. 19, 2018, starting with the May primary elections.
ptrCongDist2011022018
State of Pennsylvania
2011 congressional map (drawn by the GOP-controlled General Assembly)
PTRwolfredistricting02020218
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf
PTRwolfredistricting03020218
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
A panel takes questions from student, faculty and community members regarding non-partisan redistricting at Point Park University on Feb. 1, 2018.
RedistrictingPennsylvania61974jpgc1578
Matt Rourke/AP
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf
ptrCongDistNew022018
State of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania congressional map imposed by the state Supreme Court on Feb. 19, 2018, starting with the May primary elections.

A Tuesday-morning tweet from President Donald Trump urged Pennsylvania Republicans to fight the new congressional district map imposed by the state Supreme Court and seemed to support the “original” map the Democratic-majority court had ruled was unconstitutionally gerrymandered in favor of Republicans.

“Hope Republicans in the Great State of Pennsylvania challenge the new ‘pushed’ Congressional Map, all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary,” Trump tweeted.



Republicans have called the new 18-district map gerrymandered in favor of Democrats, and House Speaker Mike Turzai vowed “further action in federal court.” A statement from Republican Party Chairman Val DiGiorgio said the court had violated the separation of powers by usurping the Legislature’s role in drawing district lines.

The U.S. Supreme Court had previously turned down an emergency request from state Republicans to stop the redistricting, which came just weeks before candidates could start running for the May 2018 primary. The highest federal court typically does not review state court decisions based on a state’s constitution.

The court had given legislators less than a month to come up with new maps that would pass the Legislature and get Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf’s signature, or else the court would step in with maps of its own based on evidence presented over the course of the case brought by the League of Women Voters, which had submitted hundreds of possible maps resulting in a 9-9 split or an 8-10 split favoring Republicans.

Trump’s tweet also seemed to favor going back to the old congressional map, saying, “Your Original was correct!” But many experts and a 4-3 majority on the Supreme Court said the old map, which produced contorted shapes like the one dubbed “Goofy kicking Donald Duck,” was unconstitutional in the way it skewed results in Republicans’ favor. Democrats on the court outnumber Republicans 5-2.

Trump tweeted about the map again on Saturday calling the redrawn election lines “very unfair to Republicans and to our country as a whole.”

Some analyses showed the new map would have eight or nine districts where Democrats could win Congressional seats, as opposed to the five of 18 they hold under the old map in place since 2011.

Democrats hold a slight edge in registered voters in the state, all the statewide row offices are held by Democrats, and the two Senate seats are split between Democrat Bob Casey and Republican Pat Toomey.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6660, msantoni@tribweb.com, or on Twitter @msantoni. Staff writer Michael DiVittorio contributed to this story.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.