ShareThis Page
Virginia Senate debate turns ugly fast |
Politics Election

Virginia Senate debate turns ugly fast

The Washington Post
Republican Corey Stewart, left, responds to a question during the Virginia Senatorial Debate with Democrat Tim Kaine at Capital One Headquarters in McLean, Virginia, on Wednesday night. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Katherine Frey

MCLEAN, Va. — Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., and his Republican challenger Corey Stewart squared off Wednesday in a mostly hostile prime-time debate, sparring over immigration, transportation and health care on a night underscored by the rancor in Washington over Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination.

Minutes into the event, their mutual disdain was evident as they talked over each other in a series of exchanges that included Stewart implying — without evidence — that Kaine has committed sexual assault.

“There have been 268 allegations of sexual harassment against you and others [in Congress],” Stewart said. He was referring to $17.2 million paid by Congress since 1990 for 264 settlements and awards to federal employees for violations of a wide variety of employment rules, ranging from the Americans With Disabilities Act to sexual harassment. It is not publicly known how many were due to sexual misconduct.

“You just tried to slip in that there were complaints against me, and that is completely false,” Kaine said.

“How do we know that?” Stewart shot back.

“Oh, so you just think you can make it up,” Kaine said.

The hour-long debate, moderated by NBC’s “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd, was the second of three debates in the race before the Nov. 6 election.

Kaine, D, who is leading Stewart by nearly 20 points in most polls, has cast the race as a referendum against President Donald Trump’s unsteady leadership.

He characterized Stewart as a Trump loyalist who will do the president’s bidding at any cost, while demonizing immigrants and minimizing the allegations against Kavanaugh.

“It comes down to our very campaign themes,” Kaine said, addressing a crowd of about 200 people inside the Capital One bank headquarters in McLean, Virginia. “I’m running on an upbeat theme: ‘A Virginia that works for all.’ My opponent is running on an angry and divisive theme: ‘Take Virginia back.’ “

Stewart, who pledged to run “the most vicious, ruthless campaign” to unseat Kaine, called the former Virginia governor and lieutenant governor ineffective in Washington and a “bitter” partisan who wants to undermine the president because he hasn’t gotten over 2016, when he was Hillary Clinton’s running mate and they lost the presidential election to Trump.

“Senator Kaine votes no on everything,” Stewart said in his opening statement. Kaine noted that he has written 17 pieces of legislation that have been signed into law by Trump as evidence that he can work with the president.

The Senate race has long been considered Kaine’s to lose in a state that Clinton carried by five points in the 2016 presidential election and where Trump remains deeply unpopular.

Kaine — who raised $19.3 million this summer — has unleashed a steady flow of TV and social media ads saying that Stewart would “hurt Virginia” as a senator by, among other things, supporting cuts to Medicaid. He has also trekked across the state to try to help Democrats running for the House win their races as part of what his party hopes will be a blue wave of victories in November.

Stewart, meanwhile, has been marred by controversy over ties to white supremacists while running a bare-bones campaign that has raised just $1.3 million.

While Stewart has attacked Kaine relentlessly — including a tweet this month about immigrant-related crimes that showed a doctored image of Kaine with blood on his hands — his party has been split over his candidacy.

That challenge was highlighted earlier Wednesday when former Republican senator John Warner announced that he is endorsing Kaine — a fact Kaine highlighted Wednesday night by acknowledging Warner’s presence in the audience.

In recent weeks, Stewart has tried to soften his image. He fired a top consultant last month, whom he blamed for setting an angry tone for the campaign which alienated potential voters, and for encouraging Stewart to align with right-wing extremists like Paul Nehlen.

At Wednesday’s debate, he highlighted his role as chair of the Prince William Board of County Supervisors, saying he has worked to get new roads and schools built in that diverse community.

“I’ve had to twist a few arms, maybe even break a few, to get things done in Prince William County,” Stewart said.

Kaine highlighted several pieces of legislation he recently sponsored, including the Ships Act of 2017, which committed the U.S. Navy to having at least 355 battle-ready ships, and a bill recently signed into law that increases funding to battle the opioid addiction crisis.

“Corey may think it’s nothing to build a 355-ship Navy, or battle opioids,” Kaine said. “He thinks it’s nothing to expand career education and technical education and medical research, but Virginians think it’s something.”

In one exchange, Stewart bashed Kaine’s proposal to provide Medicare as an option on the health exchange created through the Affordable Care Act.

“You know what that means? He wants to take it all — from your pockets,” Stewart said to the audience, arguing that the idea would raise health care premiums and insurance deductibles.

In another, Kaine accused Stewart of “smearing” so-called “dreamers,” after Stewart said he would not allow those undocumented immigrants who were brought into the country as children to remain in the U.S. out of worry that some would commit murder.

In response to a question about whether Virginia should become the final state to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, guaranteed equal protection for women as part of the Constitution, Stewart said it would lead to men suing to get into women’s athletic programs. He said the idea was good only for “litigators and lawyers” who would profit from lawsuits.

“Good for litigators and lawyers? How about good for women?” Kaine said.

A few times, Todd tried to get the candidates to find common ground, asking at one point how they might avoid “the national train wreck” that is sure to come from Thursday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, his first public accuser.

Kaine argued that all the women who’ve come forward should be treated with respect.

“Remember, our children are watching,” he said.

Stewart ignored the question and, again, accused Kaine of helping to cover up sexual assault allegations against lawmakers in Congress.

“If the Senate treated each other the way that they’re treating Judge Kavanaugh, they’d all be in jail or getting counseling,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.