Port Authority failure: Gutless acquiescence |

Port Authority failure: Gutless acquiescence

The Port Authority of Allegheny County is moving ahead with plans for a 35 percent service cut come March. Hundreds of layoffs are expected, too. And additional cuts to both aren’t out of the question. But the mass-transit agency continues to be in serious denial about what truly ails it.

The authority blames everybody and everything except itself. There’s “the state” and “the feds” for failing to win and authorize tolling of Interstate 80. There’s the Legislature’s “failure” to throw it a bailout. There are the “flat” or falling state subsidies over the years.

But despite reactionary cost- cutting efforts, little or nothing has been done to address cost structure . And that is the product of the political machinations of the likes of Gov. Ed Rendell and county Chief Executive Dan Onorato.

The bottom line, as the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy keeps reminding, is that the Port Authority (based on 2009 numbers) “continues to operate an expensive bus system with per trip costs well above the levels in comparably sized cities such as Cincinnati, Charlotte, Minneapolis and Milwaukee.”

And that all rests with politically bad decisions to placate organized labor, including that third rail of refusing to bar transit strikes.

Something has to give here. Unfortunately, nobody seems to have the guts to force the issue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.