ShareThis Page
Postwar in Iraq: True to the mission … |

Postwar in Iraq: True to the mission …

| Tuesday, April 22, 2003 12:00 a.m

A new chapter opened for Iraq Monday with the arrival of its postwar administrator. Among priorities facing retired U.S. Lt. Gen. Jay Garner will be to restore vital basic services, such as electricity, and, over time, to achieve that which has not previously existed in this culture of confinement: basic human rights.

“We will help you, but it is going to take time,” Garner told doctors at Baghdad’s Yarmuk hospital.

The optimistic outlook is that it will take years to achieve Iraq’s self-governance. For good reason, the transition from so many decades of darkness into light must be carefully orchestrated.

Indeed, a long, difficult journey awaits. But as with any journey, it begins with that all-important first step.

Meanwhile, the sophists of foreign policy — the same folks who insisted that Saddam Hussein should be coddled, not confronted — are yammering that there has been no recovery of weapons of mass destruction — in effect, no smoking gun for war.

What’s absent is their credibility. In a nation the size of California, it may take a year or longer to locate and fully assess Saddam’s arsenal of death, experts say.

Oh, and there’s this dispatch yesterday from none other than the anti-war New York Times: An Iraqi scientist who said he worked on Saddam’s chemical weapons told investigators that Iraq buried and destroyed chemical weapons and biological warfare equipment in the days prior to war. He also reportedly led Americans to some of the suspect material.

Moreover, the scientist said Iraq was indeed cooperating with Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida terror network, and that Saddam stockpiled deadly chemicals in Syria in the mid-1990s.

It will take time, but eventually all of Saddam’s evil pursuits will be uncovered — just as Iraq’s self-government will emerge from the wreckage of his regime.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.