ShareThis Page
Pre-sentence report approved for former jail guard |

Pre-sentence report approved for former jail guard

| Wednesday, July 6, 2011 12:00 p.m

A former Allegheny County Jail guard will get an idea of what his sentence could be should he decide to plead guilty to federal charges connected with the Oct. 13 beating of a prisoner, a judge decided on Tuesday.

Arii Metz, 32, of the North Side filed a motion on Monday asking for a pre-plea sentence investigation, which U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer approved.

Metz is charged with aggravated assault, obstruction of justice and official oppression in the attack on David Kipp, 24, of Polish Hill. The county suspended him in November and fired him in January.

James Wymard, Metz’s attorney, couldn’t be reached for comment. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to comment.

David Harris, a University of Pittsburgh law professor who studies federal criminal procedures, said the request makes sense because it would be difficult for lawyers on either side to predict what kind of sentence Metz could face if he pleads guilty.

With more routine charges, such as drug dealing, experienced lawyers often can predict what kind of sentences their clients could face, particularly if there are previous convictions.

“It’s a little unusual because, for most people, you have a much better idea what the eventual result will be,” he said.

The sentencing request doesn’t necessarily signal that Metz intends to plead guilty, just that he and his lawyer want as much information as possible before making that decision, Harris said.

Judges normally order pre-sentence investigations after a defendant pleads guilty or is convicted by a jury. Federal probation and parole officers gather information on subjects such as the person’s criminal history, family life and education, and recommend a sentencing range to the judge.

The judge isn’t bound by the recommendation, but the report is one of the main factors in the judge’s decision, Harris said.

The report is due on Sept. 6.

The investigation involves two other guards. Timothy C. Miller, 54, who also was fired, told police he saw Metz slam Kipp into a bench and punch him at least 10 times in the face. Miller has not been charged.

Marcia Williams, 39, is facing state charges for acting as Metz’s lookout during the assault. She resigned her position but claimed there was no physical confrontation between Metz and Kipp.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.