Archive

ShareThis Page
Preseason favorites Central Catholic, Woodland Hills set for quarterfinals | TribLIVE.com
News

Preseason favorites Central Catholic, Woodland Hills set for quarterfinals

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 5, 2014 10:45 p.m
ptrprcc09101814
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Central Catholic's John Petrishen breaks up a second-quarter pass intended for Pine-Richland's D'Ondre Gastion on Friday, Oct. 17, 2014, at Highmark Stadium.
ptrprcc08101814
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Central Catholic's Damar Hamlin beats Pine-Richland's Jimmy Graf for a second-quarter touchdown Friday, Oct. 17, 2014, at Highmark Stadium.
PTRWHWestA07101114
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Woodland Hills' Jo-el Shaw scores past West Allegheny's Tyler Scanlon during their game Friday, Oct. 10, 2014, in North Fayette.

Central Catholic and Woodland Hills were the preseason favorites to meet at Heinz Field.

Instead, they’ll settle for Newman Stadium.

The Class AAAA finalists from last season, No. 3 seed Central Catholic (9-1) and No. 6 Woodland Hills (8-2) will cross paths a couple of weeks earlier than most expected in a quarterfinal matchup Friday night at North Allegheny.

“We both got tripped up a little,” Central Catholic coach Terry Totten said.

Both were cruising toward a conference title before a late-season stumble knocked them off course.

Central Catholic lost to Pine-Richland in Week 8. The 48-28 loss exposed a Vikings defense that allowed just three touchdowns in the first seven weeks.

Woodland Hills lost to Penn Hills in Week 9. The Wolverines offense averaged 38.5 points before the 22-15 loss to their rival.

Now both face the same question: Have they recovered from those difficult losses?

“We feel we have,” Totten said. “This will be a real good test for that. We’ll have the answer to that question Friday.”

Both had lopsided first-round wins. Central Catholic beat No. 14 Norwin, 42-7. Woodland Hills beat No. 11 North Hills, 41-2.

“I think we’ve regrouped,” Woodland Hills coach George Novak said. “It’s playoff time. You lose you’re out. So everybody’s focus goes up in practice, and you spend a little bit more time on the game plan. I’m sure they’re doing the same thing.”

Central Catholic won 27-7 in last season’s WPIAL championship. Its most recent quarterfinal matchup was in 2009, when Woodland Hills won 36-3.

“You expect to see them at some point (in the playoffs),” Totten said, “either now or then.”

Combined, the teams have made 14 championship appearances since 1999. Only three times in that 15-year span did the Class AAAA final not include one of the two.

“Central and Woodland Hills, we probably have as many Division I athletes as anyone in the playoffs,” Novak said. “I think it’s going to be a great football game.”

Both teams have solid lines and strong backfields.”

Woodland Hills features Penn State recruit Miles Sanders, a junior who leads his team with 1,132 yards and 18 touchdowns on 97 carries. Teammate Jo-El Shaw has 696 yards and 10 touchdowns, and quarterback Jeremiah Jones has 843 yards passing, 367 rushing and 11 combined touchdowns.

Sanders and Shaw scored twice each last week.

“You’ve got to be as physical as they’re going to be,” Totten said. “And you’ve got to limit their big plays. They can go to the house at any time.”

Central Catholic can, too.

The Vikings had an 84-yard touchdown run by Ronnie Jones and a 66-yard punt return by Johnny Petrishen last week.

Central Catholic has three rushers with at least 400 yards and five touchdowns. Senior running back Grant Foster leads with 714 yards and 16 touchdowns on 109 carries.

“It will be hard-fought,” Totten said. “I think it will be a classic matchup between us, like we’ve had over the years.”

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at charlan@tribweb.com or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.