ShareThis Page
Prison guard suspended after altercation |

Prison guard suspended after altercation

Matthew Junker
| Tuesday, March 11, 2003 12:00 a.m

A lieutenant at the Fayette County Prison was suspended Monday after he was charged with threatening a Smithfield family at gunpoint.

Mark R. Schiffbauer, 47, of Fairchance, allegedly threatened to kill the family of Mark Foster Sr. over a family dispute on Feb. 7.

Schiffbauer was hired at the prison in 1990. He works at the front desk and is paid $14.72 an hour, according to the county controller.

According to the alleged victim, Mark Foster Sr. of Smithfield, Schiffbauer threatened to kill his entire family and said he could get away with it because of his position at the prison.

Schiffbauer was charged with simple assault, terroristic threats, carrying a firearm without a license, recklessly endangering another person, disorderly conduct and harassment.

Warden Larry Medlock said Schiffbauer was suspended without pay yesterday until further action is taken by the prison board, which is scheduled to meet today.

Also charged were Tracy L. Schiffbauer and Parrish T. George.

Tracy Schiffbauer, 45, Mark Schiffbauer’s wife, also allegedly brandished a gun and threatened to kill Foster. She is charged with terroristic threats, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person and harassment.

George, 31, of Uniontown, faces a summary charge of harassment for striking Foster’s son, Brandon Matthews.

According to Foster, the dispute began when a third party allegedly assaulted his son’s girlfriend, who is related to Schiffbauer.

Foster said his young daughters witnessed the incident and were threatened with death.

Both Schiffbauers charged were released on $25,000 bond after arraignment last week before District Justice Randy Abraham of Fairchance.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.