Archive

ShareThis Page
Profits & pollution | TribLIVE.com
News

Profits & pollution

President Bush recently decided to put more pollution into our lungs and more profits into the hands of his campaign contributors in the energy industry.

Bush and adviser Karl Rove have perfected the art of green washing. Witness the cynically named “Healthy Forests” initiative, which will clear-cut more forests and increase fire risk to communities out West; “Clear Skies,” which will give more children asthma; and Bush’s energy proposals, which are seeking to capitalize on the blackout to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling.

Nevermind that electricity is not generated from oil, and that the blackout could have been prevented if Bush had approved legislation two years ago to upgrade the grid. Instead, Bush wants to spend $30 billion of our tax dollars to build nuclear power plants that no one wants and countless billions for fossil-fuel subsidies.

Bush/Cheney must be exposed for their role in jeopardizing our economy, environment and health in their ruthless quest to reward their energy industry cronies.

Robert SilberWest View The writer is a regional organizer with the Sierra Club.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.