ShareThis Page
Program will help ID drug-impaired drivers |

Program will help ID drug-impaired drivers

Richard Robbins
| Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:00 a.m

State police hope to remove impaired drivers from Pennsylvania roads with training that helps officers identify drug users pulled over during traffic stops.

The drug-recognition expert program has grown from eight trained officers and 53 drug evaluations in 2005 to 36 officers and 440 evaluations last year.

“We are training officers to determine if a driver is under the influence of illegal drugs, prescription drugs or other substances that impair a person’s ability to operate a vehicle safely,” state police Commissioner Jeffrey B. Miller said.

State police Capt. Jacob Criders said the state expects to train 20 new drug-recognition experts in 2008.

Local police officers are eligible for training, but the amount of time — 200 hours — can be an impediment for small departments, Criders said.

The experts, called DREs, originated with the Los Angeles Police Department in the 1970s.

It wasn’t until 1987 that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation initiated pilot programs in Arizona, Colorado, New York and Virginia.

Forty-four states and the District of Columbia field detection experts, all of whom are certified by the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

These experts only move into action after a driver has passed an alcohol sobriety test, but still appears impaired.

“We bring them in once alcohol is ruled out,” said Criders, who is based at state police headquarters in Harrisburg. “Most of the work is done at the (police) station.”

Troop A in Greensburg has one drug-recognition expert, Trooper Scott Gregg, Criders said. Gregg was not available for comment.

The identification “protocol,” Crider said, includes a check of the driver’s pulse, an eye examination, a motor-skills test, a dark-room examination of pupil size, an examination of muscle tone, a check of needle injection sites and toxicology tests involving urine, blood and/or saliva.

Crider said suspects are held under the general charge of driving under the influence. The testing takes about 20 minutes, he said.

The goal is to place a drug-recognition expert at every state police station, and to engage as many municipal departments as possible, Crider said.

Greensburg Police Chief Walter Lyons said members of his department have received training in the detection of drug use.

Lyons and Uniontown Police Chief Jason Cox said they have little information about the DRE training.

Dr. Jeffrey Michael, director of DOT’s office of impaired driving, said upwards of 8,000 drug-recognition evaluations were made in the United States last year. He said the government’s goal was to extend the training to every state.

The prosecution of drug-impairment cases generally “is very difficult,” Michael said. “That is why the training is so thorough.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.