Project SEED hits its goal |

Project SEED hits its goal

We know many Alle-Kiski Valley residents watch the large Project SEED progress meter displayed at the intersection of Leechburg and Tarentum Bridge roads.

That sign will soon say we have achieved our fundraising goal of $30,000 to feed hungry children in the New Kensington-Arnold area. The money raised provides 224 children — preschool to grade 2 — with weekend bags of food so they have “Something to Eat Every Day” (SEED).

We are astounded and grateful for the extremely generous donations of volunteer time, food and money that makes this project possible. Support has come from nonprofit organizations, clubs, churches, foundations, local businesses and caring citizens from this valley and across the United States.

We also thank the dedicated New Kensington city workers who pick up and deliver the bins of food to the schools weekly, the volunteers at the Alle-Kiski Center for Active Adults who pack the food bags each Wednesday and the New Kensington-Arnold School District staff who register the children for the project, deliver the food to the classrooms and distribute it to the children in their backpacks.

These efforts are helping to bridge the hunger gap in our community and ensure that these children come to school on Mondays ready to learn — not ready to eat.

It’s been a long, cold winter but the way we see it, the generosity and compassion of the people who call this valley home was warm beyond measure.

Thank you all so much.

Joanne Cecchi

New Kensington

Ruth Carson


The writers are the co-founders of Project SEED.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.