Property tax rate holds steady in Penn Township |

Property tax rate holds steady in Penn Township

Penn Township commissioners approved its 2016 budget Monday night.

Commissioners voted 4-0 to approve the $8.3 million budget for next year. Commissioner Edward Sullivan was absent.

The spending plan keeps tax rate steady at 14.7 mills. Taxes have stayed the same since 2013 when a 1-mill increase was approved for the township's fire departments.

Commissioner Tim Gwynn thanked the staff for presenting a plan that did not require a tax increase.

“I thought it was a very smooth process,” Gwynn said.

As the township concludes financial planning for 2016, officials are making efforts to formalize how it saves money for emergencies.

Commissioners approved a policy for the township's reserve fund Monday night.

The plan requires an amount equal to 15 percent of the general fund budget be available for emergencies and contingencies.

It also establishes rules for using capital and operating reserve funds.

“It essentially sets up a savings account, one related to the general fund and one related to the capital reserve fund,” Graziani said. “It tries to put on paper what we've tried to do as practice for the last several years.”

Finance director Linda Iams, who will retire next year, said the policy will help the township avoid the need to borrow money until tax revenue comes in each year.

“I think it will set a clear policy of what we need in that account so that we do not have to do a tax anticipation note,” Iams said.

Commissioners also approved several salaries for 2016. Police Chief John Otto will earn $100,688, public works director Scot Fodi will earn $73,500, director of community development Dallas Leonard will make $75,350, public works foreman Thomas Lamacz will make $665,715 and Iams will earn $67,333.

Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2867, or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.