ShareThis Page
Proposal to curb panhandling gets OK |

Proposal to curb panhandling gets OK

| Thursday, October 27, 2005 12:00 p.m

Pittsburgh City Council gave unanimous preliminary approval Wednesday to restrictions on panhandling at night and near outdoor cafes, bus stops, theaters and automatic tellers.

The Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership, which represents more than 800 businesses that favor the proposal, said distance and time restrictions are needed to protect Downtown shoppers and theater-goers from annoying and aggressive panhandlers.

The proposed city ordinance would outlaw panhandling between sunset and sunrise; within 25 feet of a sidewalk cafe or a line of people waiting to enter a theater or buy tickets there; and within 10 feet of a street food vendor or a bus stop.

Police would give first-time violators a warning and call a social services agency to offer the suspect assistance. Second and third violations would carry maximum fines of $50 and $300, respectively, and 100 hours of community service.

Anyone convicted of physically aggressive panhandling under the ordinance could be punished with a $100 fine, 100 hours of community service and up to a month in jail. A second conviction triples the maximum fine and jail time.

Quietly panhandling with a sign or cup to collect donations would be permitted all day, but not in the restricted areas.

Council could give final approval to the ordinance next week.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.