ShareThis Page
Proposal would disband or sell county authorities |

Proposal would disband or sell county authorities

| Wednesday, May 5, 2010 12:00 p.m

An Allegheny County councilman is proposing to disband or sell the authorities that run county airports, sewage, sports venues and transit — and using the money, instead, to protect against budget shortfalls.

Councilman Chuck McCullough introduced a resolution Tuesday night that would have council study whether the assets and functions of the Port Authority, Airport Authority, Alcosan and the Sports and Exhibition Authority could be sold to private contractors or absorbed into the county government.

“If we could sell these things, the money we get through that could be put into a rainy-day fund,” McCullough said. “They put a drain on us, and they haven’t brought in the economic development and the revenue they were supposed to.”

McCullough introduced a similar measure last year, but it never got out of the Government Reform Committee, said Council President Rich Fitzgerald.

This time, though, McCullough is citing a warning from County Controller Mark Patrick Flaherty that the county last year relied heavily on one-time cash boosts — selling property and tapping reserves — to make up a $32.5 million deficit. The county could face even worse financial problems this year.

“They can spend all the money they want studying it, but at the end of the day it’s a waste of taxpayer money because they don’t have the power to disband,” said Jeffrey Letwin, attorney for the Airport Authority and a member of the Port Authority’s board of directors.

The Airport Authority would have to pay off about $500 million in debts, and its board would have to vote to dissolve itself, he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.