ShareThis Page
Proposed bill targets tools used for graffiti |

Proposed bill targets tools used for graffiti

| Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:00 p.m

Young people in Pittsburgh would be banned from buying or even possessing spray paint, indelible markers, acid and glass-etching tools under a bill city council preliminarily approved Wednesday.

Shopkeepers and parents of children who break the law would face a warning the first time and a fine of up to $300 on the second offense. Council members said the steps are necessary to combat an epidemic of graffiti.

“All neighborhoods are experiencing this vandalism throughout the city of Pittsburgh,” said council President Gene Ricciardi, who introduced the legislation. “That’s what it is — vandalism. It’s not art.”

Six members voted for the bill, with Sala Udin and Twanda Carlisle abstaining. The measure comes up for a final vote Tuesday.

Councilman William Peduto said he is concerned the bill infringes on the civil rights of minors but voted for the legislation after saying his district has had more graffiti damage than any other.

The bills also would direct Pittsburgh public schools to educate students about the consequences of graffiti and ask Allegheny County to pass similar legislation.

In other business, council agreed to seek state scenic byway status for parts of Mt. Washington. Councilman Alan Hertzberg has said that status could help the city win state and federal money for road and overlook improvements.

Council delayed action one week on a bill that would ban motorized bikes and all-terrain vehicles from public parks.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.