ShareThis Page
Proposed condominium expansion in the works |

Proposed condominium expansion in the works

A proposed condominium project has grown from 48 residential units to 60.

The Mt. Lebanon Planning Board this week gave Bill Bannow, a partner in Point View Properties, preliminary approval to expand the size of Cedar Heights of Mt. Lebanon.

Construction of the 12-story structure could begin this summer at 440 Washington Road, near Bower Hill Road. Final approvals from the municipality still are needed.

Bannow anticipates a two-year construction period.

Bannow said the $25 million project will offer two- and three-bedroom units, priced from $288,000 to $630,000.

The two-bedroom homes will have 1,750 square feet, while the three-bedroom units will range from 2,150 to 2,275 square feet.

Each unit will have an outdoor terrace area of 8 by 20 feet.

“Originally, we planned 48 units, but when we were able to secure another property we added 12 more units,” he said.

There will be five units per floor, with two indoor parking spaces per unit. The complex also will have an outdoor swimming pool, which will be enclosed during winter to permit year-round use.

Also, two penthouse units on the top floor will have private rooftop patios, and a patio for common use also will be provided.

To complete the project, Point View has plans to acquire a 39,000-square-foot site from the Mt. Lebanon Parking Authority.

Mt. Lebanon commissioners approved the sale of the parking authority property to Point View last August. However, the $440,000 deal has not yet been finalized.

Parking authority President Bill Friedman said he anticipates final approval of the sale could come before his board very shortly.

Bannow had previously received preliminary approval for his project last June, but had to alter his plans after securing additional land, a former residential property along Kenmont Avenue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.