ShareThis Page
Proposed EF budget cuts come under fire |

Proposed EF budget cuts come under fire

| Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:00 a.m

Concern is running high in the Elizabeth Forward Area School District, where program and personnel cuts loom due to budgetary constraints.

Parents, teachers, students and other district stakeholders turned out by the score for a school board workshop meeting Wednesday in which the district’s 2010-11 budget was discussed.

Foreign language instruction at the middle school, special education, athletic programs and positions in technology department are some of the items on the chopping block.

The district approved a $37.8 million preliminary budget in March that contained a funding shortfall of about $2 million. It hopes to approve final version of its spending plan next week. School officials said there are still aspects of the budget being worked out and additional changes could be made.

A lack of specifics on which programs would see changes frustrated those in attendance who wanted hard answers.

“Do we have a plan today• No,” board president Margaret Morgan admitted when pressed for answers about one of the proposed changes.

Resident Allene McCall called district superintendent Bart Rocco on one of the phrases he and other district officials used a lot at the meeting “We are looking at restructuring.”

“Define ‘restructuring’ please,” asked McCall, who was upset that foreign languages might be eliminated at the middle school.

Again, there was no definitive answer, though Rocco said the option of cutting the language classes was being looked at with core curriculum classes taking their place.

Many are upset that the district is looking at combining its seventh- and eighth-grade athletic programs, eliminating elementary basketball coordinators and nixing the indoor boys and girls track program.

John Walsh, who owns E-Town Pizza in Elizabeth, said his shop has donated thousands of dollars to school athletic programs over the years. He said the district should find money in its coffers to keep the track program alive.

“All we’re talking is $3,500,” Walsh said.

District employee Denise Napoli said she’s upset that two technology positions might be cut.

“Who’s going to do the work to maintain these computers?” she asked.

The district also is looking at cutting a special education teacher and half-time business education teacher at the high school, a speech teacher, its public relations director, three response-to-intervention positions and eight instructional aides.

The school board is considering putting $500,000 from its fund balance toward the budget.

School officials hope to avoid a tax increase and noted that even if Elizabeth Forward does raise taxes, the .96 mills it is permitted by law, the extra revenue would only be about $600,000.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.