Prosecutors: Capitol attack plotter kept trying to incite |

Prosecutors: Capitol attack plotter kept trying to incite

The Associated Press

CINCINNATI — An Ohio man who plotted to attack the U.S. Capitol during President Obama’s 2015 State of the Union address kept trying from behind bars to urge others to violence in support of the Islamic State group, federal authorities say.

Prosecutors described 22-year-old Christopher Lee Cornell’s jail activities in a sentencing memorandum filed this week ahead of a Dec. 5 sentencing hearing. They want a judge to sentence him to 30 years in prison after he pleaded guilty earlier this year to three charges.

“This case is unusual in the amount of post-arrest conduct and misconduct by the defendant … his persistence in trying to incite violence and his efforts to obstruct justice through witness intimidation,” the filing by U.S. Attorney Benjamin C. Glassman’s office stated. “These events reflect a profound lack of remorse, or at least, a very lengthy delay in the appearance of remorse by Cornell.”

Cornell’s attorneys plan to state their recommendations on sentencing next week to U.S. District Judge Sandra Beckwith.

The defense Wednesday filed a mental health report for Cornell under seal, and stated they plan to have psychologist Scott Bresler, who has met repeatedly with Cornell, testify at the sentencing hearing.

The FBI arrested Cornell on Jan. 14, 2015, in a gun shop parking lot in suburban Cincinnati, saying he had just bought two M-15 semi-automatic rifles and 600 rounds of ammunition. He was arrested less than a week before Obama’s scheduled address in Washington; federal authorities say Cornell wanted to shoot the president, members of Congress and others at the speech.

Prosecutors said Cornell continued while in jail to promote violence, trying to circulate his “Message to America” call for others to “fight against the disbelieving people of America.” He told WXIX-TV in an interview that he wanted to shoot Obama in the head, and U.S. authorities said he was able to circumvent a security program on a jail computer terminal meant for legal research to make internet posts about his Capitol attack plan and call for others to wage “violent jihad.”

They said he also was “fixated” on learning the true identity of a confidential informant and had numerous discussions with his father about him. Cornell’s attorneys have said they will highlight the role of a government confidential informant at the sentencing hearing.

Federal investigators said Cornell made an internet post after his arrest in which he identified the man he believed he was the informant and gave personal details about him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.