Prospective buyer of The Meadows sues casino's owner |

Prospective buyer of The Meadows sues casino's owner

A Berks County company that announced in May it would buy a Washington County casino and racetrack for $475 million says it is suing the owner to get back the $10 million it paid for a related consulting agreement.

Gaming & Leisure Properties Inc. announced in a news release and a notice filed Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it sued Cannery Casino Resorts LLC in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The clerk's office there was unable to find any lawsuit filed under Gaming & Leisure Properties' name.

Cannery, based in Las Vegas, said in its own release that it “believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend against it vigorously.”

Gaming & Leisure Properties said in the SEC notice that it sued Cannery on Monday “alleging, among other things, fraud, breach of the agreement and breach of the related consulting agreement entered into at the same time.”

In addition to the $10 million, the company is seeking unspecified damages, the notice says.

Spokesmen for both companies didn't respond to messages seeking comment.

The SEC notice says Gaming & Leisure can't predict what effect the lawsuit will have on its proposed purchase of The Meadows Racetrack and Casino in North Strabane.

Cannery Casino Resorts “intends to take all available measures” to ensure the sale goes through by Nov. 13, the company's release said.

Gaming & Leisure Properties is a spinoff of Penn National Gaming Inc. that leases gambling properties to other companies that actually operate racetracks and casinos. Cannery Casino Resorts also owns two casinos in Nevada.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Total Trib Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.