ShareThis Page
Protester picked up on bad check charges |

Protester picked up on bad check charges

Matthew Junker
| Saturday, February 8, 2003 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County constable said Friday he had no intention of harassing picketers protesting the decision not to file charges against police in connection with the shooting death of a 12-year-old boy in Uniontown.

Constable Bob Barron said he asked Sheriff Gary Brownfield to arrest Darlene Dennis, of Uniontown, when he read her name in a news account of an upcoming People Against Police Violence march.

“I don’t have access to a computer. I read the newspapers. That’s how I find (wanted) people,” Barron said.

The constable escorted Dennis, who faced charges for writing a bad check, from the picket line to the office of South Union District Justice Rick Vernon.

Her companions on the picket line and a member of the national board of directors for the NAACP said they suspected that Dennis was singled out because of her views.

Barron denied this. “I was going to ride her back (to the picket line). I didn’t say, ‘You can’t go back there,'” he said.

Michael Ellerbe, of Uniontown, was shot to death by state police Trooper Samuel Nassan on Dec. 24 on the mistaken assumption that his partner had been shot by Ellerbe during a foot chase. According to testimony offered Jan. 27 at an inquest into the death, Trooper Juan Curry had caught his pants on a fence he was attempting to vault and his gun fired.

Ellerbe, who was black, was running from a stolen sport utility vehicle and had ignored repeated commands to stop, according to the troopers.

Four days after the inquest, District Attorney Nancy Vernon decided not to press charges against the officers. Picketers have held signs outside the courthouse almost daily since Vernon’s decision.

Since then the Pittsburgh-based People Against Police Violence group has met to organize a Feb. 15 march to protest the investigation and Vernon’s decision. Another meeting to discuss the march is set for 10 a.m. today in the Lemon Wood Acres community room.

According to Vernon, Dennis has paid $200 to authorities since she bounced a $75 check in 1997 at Wal-Mart.

The additional $204 she still owes is for accumulating costs and fees that have been added to serve Dennis papers and to arrest her twice.

Dennis said she bounced a check she used to buy Christmas gifts for her three daughters, then didn’t have the money to pay for the items when Wal-Mart called demanding payment in one day’s time.

Vernon said Dennis has until March 18 to pay the charges in full or she will serve 10 days in prison.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.