Protesters suspected in Oakland damage |

Protesters suspected in Oakland damage

Pittsburgh police will be watching surveillance videos from Oakland to see if any familiar faces pop up.

Security cameras might have captured footage of unidentified protesters breaking more than a dozen windows Tuesday evening at a PNC Bank and a neighboring building on Fifth Avenue and Craig Street, police spokeswoman Diane Richard said.

Investigators suspect the protest was in response to the jail sentence imposed hours earlier on David Japenga, 21, who caused $15,000 in damage to three businesses at Fifth and Craig during last year’s protests of the Group of 20 international economic summit. Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski sentenced Japenga to six to 18 months in the Allegheny County Jail.

Defense attorney Patrick Nightingale filed a written request for early parole for Japenga after Borkowski denied a request at the sentencing hearing. Nightingale said the vandalism doesn’t help his client’s case.

“Technically, it had nothing to do with my client, but could there be a inference that this was done at his behalf or at his behest• Certainly there could be that inference,” Nightingale said. “It’s natural to assume that it is related because it was at the same location, and it was damage that was similar in nature.”

About a dozen of Japenga’s friends attended the sentencing hearing.

Officers were called to Forbes and Bellefield avenues for reports of a protest about 8:15 p.m., Richard said. When officers arrived, about 15 people ran from the area, and police discovered the damage.

There were 13 broken windows at PNC Bank and two broken windows at a building across the street that houses Citizens Bank, police said. The damage was estimated at $97,500.

PNC is offering a reward of up to $25,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible. Police said anyone with information should call detectives at the Zone 4 station in Squirrel Hill at 412-422-6578.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.