ShareThis Page
PSO Chairman’s Council donations announced |

PSO Chairman’s Council donations announced

Mark Kanny
| Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:00 a.m

The Pittsburgh Symphony’s Chairman’s Council that was announced at last week’s annual meeting is starting with 20 corporate leaders and their companies pledging to support the local world-class orchestra.

The companies will be expected to give at least $25,000 per year to the symphony’s annual fund, said Leslie Wild Swensen , vice president for resource development. Many have been donating to the symphony for years. For example, PNC Financial, whose chairman and chief executive officer, James Rohr , is a new Chairman’s Council member, gives more than $100,000 annually.

“Some will be increasing their gift, some will be in a holding pattern and some will be donating for the first time, but we’re targeting a collective net increase of $250,000 per year,” she said.

“This isn’t just lip service, because these business leaders have promised to make personal gifts also, to reinforce the commitment,” said Swensen.

The Chairman’s Council also demonstrates “to elected officials in Harrisburg and Washington D.C., and locally to RAD, that there is a consensus among business leaders that Pittsburgh should retain a world-class orchestra,” she added.

Murry S. Gerber , chairman, president and chief executive officer of Equitable Resources, said in a prepared statement, “The PSO is one of few truly world-class assets in Pittsburgh. It is a legacy entrusted to us by the corporate leaders and wealthy families from years gone by. Since ticket sales alone have never and will never do the trick … it is personally gratifying to me that my colleagues share my conviction that the decline of the PSO will not happen on our watch.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.