ShareThis Page
PSU confident, hopeful bubble won’t burst |

PSU confident, hopeful bubble won’t burst

| Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:00 a.m

The Penn State men’s basketball program took down Big Ten coach of the year honors for Monaca native Ed DeChellis Monday, and all-conference recognition for players Talor Battle and Jamelle Cornley. Left to be determined is whether the icing on this cake will be its first bid to the NCAA tournament since 2001.

It’s that pursuit of the NCAA Tournament that is dominating thoughts of observers, although Battle is doing his best to ignore it.

“We really don’t talk about being on the bubble or anything like that,” he said yesterday before practice.

DeChellis, in his sixth season at Penn State, has produced his best team, one that went 21-10 overall to equal a school record for regular-season wins. The 10 Big Ten wins were the most for the Lions since the 1995-96 season.

But will it be enough to get Penn State into the Big Dance?

” I hope so. I really, really hope so,” DeChellis said. bracketologist Joe Lunardi has Penn State in his current tournament bracket as a No. 12 seed. But Penn State also is listed, along with New Mexico, Arizona and South Carolina, as the last four into the field, meaning their grip is tenuous.

Others project the Lions will need at least one win in the Big Ten Tournament, which begins for them Thursday vs. Indiana, or maybe two wins, to be sure about making the NCAA Tournament.

“We’re going to try to take it out of everybody’s hands and play the best we can in this conference tournament and win some games and make it to the NCAA Tournament,” said DeChellis, who was the conference media’s pick for coach of the year. Michigan State’s Tom Izzo was the coaches’ pick for coach of the year.

Penn State backers and critics both can find justification for their positions in the season’s results. The Lions lost to their two toughest nonconference opponents, Rhode Island and Temple. Yet, during conference play, they swept Top-25 team Illinois, split with No. 24 Purdue, won at No. 7 Michigan State, and split with Michigan and Minnesota, each projected by many as NCAA Tournament teams.

DeChellis cites those conference results to show that his team already has done enough to make the big tournament.

“I think any time you finish above .500 in your Big Ten season is a milestone,” he said. “I think that’s really important. I think winning over 20 games — over 20 games — is a milestone. I think beating four top 25 teams, a couple of them on the road, is a milestone. I think beating six teams in the top 50 RPI is a pretty good part of your resume. I think winning games on the road at Michigan State, Illinois — that we proved that we can go on the road against very good teams and win — is part of your resume. I would point to those specific things and say that’s pretty good.”

To be safe, Penn State needs to win Thursday vs. Indiana, a team the Lions already have beaten twice this season. But DeChellis is encouraging his team to have a goal beyond that, to win the Big Ten Tournament.

“We’re trying to do something that we haven’t done here before,” he said.

Sophomore point guard Battle, who led the Big Ten regular-season scoring chase with a 17.3-point average, was named first team all-conference by media and coaches.

Cornley, a senior forward who averages 13.9 points and 6.2 rebounds, was picked second team by the media and third team by the coaches. Cornley is nursing a partially separated left shoulder, suffered against Illinois last week. He played 46 minutes Saturday in Penn State’s 75-67, double-overtime loss at Iowa, scoring 10 points, but getting just one rebound. DeChellis said Cornley’s difficulty lifting his left arm helped explain that.

Additional Information:

PSU resume

Best wins: at Michigan State, Illinois (twice), Purdue and Michigan

Key non-conference losses: Rhode Island and Temple

Non-conference weak links: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Hartford, Towson, Army , Lafayette

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.