ShareThis Page
PSU players contend for awards |

PSU players contend for awards

| Thursday, December 11, 2008 12:00 a.m

A.Q. Shipley’s parents spent Wednesday making last-minute preparations for flying to Florida today, expecting to see their son officially named the winner of the Rimington Trophy as part of the Home Depot ESPNU College Football Awards show from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m. on ESPN.

“It’s hectic,” said Shipley’s father, Allan.

The Rimington Trophy honors the nation’s outstanding collegiate center.

Shipley, a team captain, previously was a All-Big Ten pick at center for the second consecutive season and was named the Big Ten Offensive Lineman of the Year for 2008.

Shipley, a senior center from Moon, isn’t the only Penn State player who’s contending for an individual award this season.

Defensive end Aaron Maybin, a redshirt sophomore, is a finalist for the Bednarik Award, which recognizes college’s top defensive player.

The Bednarik has become a Penn State monopoly in recent seasons. Linebacker Dan Connor won it last year, and fellow linebacker Paul Posluszny (Hopewell) won in 2005 and ’06.

Maybin was a finalist for the Hendricks Award, which goes to the nation’s top collegiate defensive end. But Texas’ Brian Orapko was announced yesterday as the winner.

The Walter Camp All-America team also will be announced during tonight’s ESPN show.

Also, Penn State’s Joe Paterno, already named Big Ten Coach of the Year, is one of 10 finalists for the Liberty Mutual Coach of the Year in the Football Bowl Subdivision. That winner will be announced during halftime of the Motor City Bowl on Dec. 31.

The individual awards are the residue of a successful season that saw the Nittany Lions go 11-1 and win a share of their second Big Ten title in four seasons. They will play Southern Cal on Jan. 1 in the Rose Bowl.

The team will have a pre-bowl media day Friday and is scheduled to leave for California on Dec. 20.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.