ShareThis Page
PSU to open spring drills Friday |

PSU to open spring drills Friday

| Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:00 a.m

Penn State, coming off a 9-4 season and an Outback Bowl win, opens spring drills Friday and concludes them April 21 with the Blue-White Game. In between, answers will be sought to these questions:

1) How’s the offensive line going to shape up?

Left tackle Levi Brown has moved on, likely to be taken early in the first round of the NFL Draft. Left guard Robert Price won’t be as hard to replace. A.Q. Shipley provides an anchor at center. Gerald Cadogan is a former starting left guard who is expected to get a look at left tackle. Junior college transfer Ako Poti and Dennis Landolt will be tried there, too. Lou Eliades could be a factor at left guard. Rich Ohrnberger and John Shaw, who’s coming off a knee injury, started at right guard and tackle, respectively, last season and are back.

2) Who’s going to replace tailback Tony Hunt?

Senior Austin Scott needs to prove he can make it through a spring intact, let alone a season. Ditto for Rodney Kinlaw. Redshirt freshmen Evan Royster and Brent Carter are young guns.

3) How will the defense retool?

The unit’s performance and spiritual leader, linebacker Paul Posluszny, is gone. Dan Connor might swap inside, as Posluszny did last year. Replacing tackles Jay Alford and Ed Johnson will be tough, as will be replacing versatile safety/nickel backs Donnie Johnson and Nolan McCready. Look for cornerback Tony Davis to get a look at safety, with A.J. Wallace taking his place at corner.

– By Sam Ross Jr.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.