ShareThis Page
Public works employees trying to avoid strike |

Public works employees trying to avoid strike

PLUM: The contract for Plum’s 20 public works employees expires Dec. 31, but don’t expect a strike.

“We hope to avoid any kind of strike action,” said John Winters, a business agent with Teamsters Local 205 representing the workers.

Although neither side in the talks would divulge pay issues, the sticking point in the negotiations remains the borough’s proposal that the workers pay a portion of their health insurance costs.

Union officials declined comment on their position with respect to workers contributing to their health insurance plans.

“We don’t dispute the state of the health care industry,” Winters said. “It is a problem everywhere.”

The borough, last summer, proposed that the workers pay 10 percent of the costs. Neither side would disclose if the proposal remains on the table.

“It always comes back to money, one way or another,” said Plum Councilman Jeff Russo, one of the borough’s negotiators.

Plum now pays all of the insurance costs for its 60 municipal workers, including public works employees, clerical workers, dispatchers and police. The employees are covered by a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield plan.

Health and hospitalization insurance costs in the public works department have ballooned by more than 33 percent — from $107,364 in 2002 to $144,000 this year. Plum officials have budgeted $186,722 for those costs in 2004.

“It (health and hospitalization insurance costs) is a component of costs that is accelerating at a much faster pace than any other (cost),” Plum Manager Ken Gabler said. “Every business is trying to control (the costs).”

Winters said the union has reviewed quotes from other health care providers that the borough has provided.

“We have not come to any formal agreement (concerning health insurance),” Winters said.

Gabler said the plans from other providers contain co-pays and deductibles meaning the employees would be required to take on some financial responsibility.

“That is where it comes down to negotiations,” Gabler said.

Public employees increasingly are being called upon to contribute to their health insurance plans.

Beginning with the 2004-05 school year, Plum School District’s 287 teachers will be pay $10 a month toward their health insurance.

Ten years ago, Penn Hills began requiring new hires — excluding police — to pay 10 percent of the costs.

The next negotiation session is not scheduled until Jan. 12, officials said. There have been a half-dozen negotiating sessions, the last one held earlier this month.

Gabler, meanwhile, said officials are working on a plan to ensure that the streets are plowed during snowstorms in the event that the workers go on strike after Jan. 12. Gabler declined to disclose specifics about the plan.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.