ShareThis Page
Qualifers endorse match play |

Qualifers endorse match play

Rick Starr
| Thursday, August 21, 2003 12:00 a.m

Match play might be an old idea, but it’s a hit with the new generation of U.S. Amateur qualifiers.

Without exception, contestants endorsed the head-to-head form of competition, as the Amateur switched to match play Wednesday at Oakmont Country Club, following two rounds of stroke play.

While stroke play determines the outcome of most PGA Tour events and collegiate matches, match play has decided all but eight of the past 102 National Amateurs, the oldest American golf championship.

Nothing tests a golfer like match play, former Amateur finalist Trip Kuehne said after an exhausting 18-hole, 2-up victory over Ty Harris of Tampa Bay, Fla.

“That’s when you look inside yourself and say, hey, this is the U.S. Amateur, you need to suck it up and let’s go,” Kuehne said. “They make you test yourself, and I got to see what was deep inside, deep down inside Trip Kuehne again today.”

Total 18-hole scores don’t count in match play. The competition is scored by the number of holes won rather than the strokes taken.

Kuehne, of Dallas, needed everything in his bag, including a Taylor Made driver he belted over 370 yards on the 12th hole, to advance to today’s 36-hole slugfest.

“There’s going to be lots of dogfights out there, and I was fortunate to win this dogfight,” Kuehne said. “To win a match-play championship like this, you’re going to have rounds where you’ll be tested. I was tested to the max today.”

Match play brought out the gambler in some young players.

“Match play allows you to approach the course with a completely different perspective,” 16-year-old amateur Tom Glissmeyer said after defeating Randy Nichols of Connersville, Ind., 5 and 3. “You can attack a difficult golf course like Oakmont and not worry about making an 8 or 9 because it’s match play and it’s just one hole.

“You can come back on the next hole.”

Golfers gain and lose momentum in match play.

Casey Wittenberg, 18, of Memphis, started his match bogey, bogey, bogey, but came back to win seven consecutive holes to defeat Bill Drohen of Haverhill, Mass., 5 and 3.

“I gutted it out and got it done,” Wittenberg said. “Oakmont is so difficult, there’s no let-up anywhere. It gives you a chance to come back in match play because you know nobody is going to put together a bunch of birdies on this course.”

Timing is crucial in match play, when the outcome can turn on one stroke.

Wittenberg turned his match around on the 11th hole when he put a shot inside his opponents next to the hole. Drohen didn’t win a hole the rest of the match.

“I think that hurt his confidence level a little bit and got me going a little bit more,” Wittenberg said. “A good shot at the right time makes the difference.”

Amateur Bill Haas, some of PGA Tour pro Jay Haas, won three matches and reached the semifinal before losing to champion Ricky Barnes in last year’s Amateur at Oakland Hills Country Club in Bloomfield Hills, Mich.

Haas, of Greenville, S.C., missed half the fairways during his match yesterday at Oakmont, but used his match play experience to eliminate Jessie Mudd of Louisville, Ky., 7 and 5.

“I would say I’m much more calm and not as nervous on the first tee after last year,” Haas said. “Maybe that’s just experience.”

The Amateur was a stroke-play event the last time Oakmont played host to the national

championship. Steve Melnyk won at 286.

Davy Herron (1919), Bobby Jones (1925) and Willie Turnesa (1938) won Oakmont’s first three National Amateurs in match play.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.