ShareThis Page
Quarantines “abundance of politics,” Maine nurse Hickox says of Ebola fears |

Quarantines “abundance of politics,” Maine nurse Hickox says of Ebola fears

Nurse Kaci Hickox (L) joined by her boyfriend Ted Wilbur, speaks with the media outside of their home in Fort Kent, Maine in this October 31, 2014 file photo. Hickox, who challenged quarantines of health care workers returning from treating West African Ebola patients said November 2, 2014 she thought 'an abundance of politics' lurked behind them. REUTERS/Joel Page (UNITED STATES - Tags: HEALTH POLITICS)

A nurse who challenged quarantines of health care workers returning from treating West African Ebola patients said Sunday that she thinks “an abundance of politics” lurked behind them.

Kaci Hickox has fought a heated public battle over what she considers draconian measures to isolate her for 21 days on her return from Sierra Leone. The case that highlights the dilemma over how to balance public health needs and personal liberty.

In some states, officials such as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie have imposed strict quarantines on health workers returning from three Ebola-ravaged West African countries, but the federal government opposes such measures.

“When Gov. Christie stated that it was an abundance of caution, which is his reasoning for putting health care workers in a sort of quarantine for three weeks, it was really an abundance of politics,” Hickox said in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“And I think all of the scientific and medical and public health community agrees with me on that statement,” she said.

Christie has defended his decision to impose a mandatory three-week quarantine, saying that counting on a voluntary system may or may not work and that protecting health and safety is the government’s job.

The most deadly outbreak of Ebola on record has killed nearly 5,000 people, all but a handful of them in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone.

Hickox tested negative for Ebola after returning recently from working for Doctors Without Borders in Sierra Leone. But she was placed in an isolation tent in New Jersey when she returned before being allowed to leave for Maine, which also sought to quarantine her at home.

A judge in Maine on Friday rejected that state’s bid to quarantine Hickox, instead imposing limited restrictions on her. The judge said Hickox must continue direct monitoring of her health, coordinate travel plans with health officials and report any symptoms.

“We know a lot about Ebola,” Hickox told “Meet the Press.” “We know that it’s not transmitted from someone who is asymptomatic, as I am and many other aid workers will be when they return.”

Speaking to NBC from Fort Kent, Maine, Hickox indicated she would continue to stay away from crowds in her community, but that her partner, Ted Wilbur, should be allowed to go back to nursing school on Monday.

“I understand that the community has been through a lot in the past week and I do, you know, apologize to them for that,” she told NBC.

“I will not go into town, into crowded public places … But on the other hand, you know, my partner is currently in nursing school, and there is definitely zero scientific evidence that says he shouldn’t be allowed to return to his campus on Monday.”

One person in the United States is being treated for Ebola, a New York doctor, Craig Spencer, who cared for patients in West Africa. His condition was upgraded by New York City health officials on Saturday to “stable” from “serious but stable” at Bellevue Hospital.

In Oregon, test results were awaited for a woman with a fever who was hospitalized in an isolation unit on Friday after returning from West Africa, Oregon health officials said.

She had not come into known contact with Ebola patients while in Africa, the officials added.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.