ShareThis Page
Quit adding fluoride |

Quit adding fluoride

Congratulations to Brackenridge for considering the elimination of fluoride from its drinking water. Not only will it save money, the health benefits of eliminating fluoride are immeasurable. The borough should move forward.

The question is, when is the New Kensington Municipal Authority going to remove that poison from our drinking water?

The American Dental Association long has known the dangers of fluoride exposure, especially to infants and young children that result in reduced IQ levels and cognitive damage. Ironically, it is young children who are at risk for dental fluorosis (severe tooth damage from fluoride).

In the 1990s, Harvard University conducted a 14-year study that found a link between fluoride and bone cancer. Kidney disease, arthritis, impaired thyroid function, bladder cancer and an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease are all additional risks associated with fluoride toxicity.

Also disturbing is that fluoride is a chemical that does not treat the water, as does chlorine, which is added to kill bacteria. Instead fluoride is added to our water to prevent tooth decay, which is not caused by drinking water.

Wake up, municipal authority members. Take the measures needed to remove fluoride from our water.

Citizens, become advocates for your own health. Demand that our water be free of this destructive chemical. Our health depends on it, and so does the health and well-being of our children and grandchildren.

Linda Slanicka

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.